Abstract:There is a dilemma between raising the intensive use level of agricultural land and controlling carbon emissions from agricultural land use. Carbon emissions from agricultural land use can be considered as a cost, and the suitable intensive use level of agricultural land should acquire a good efficiency of carbon emissions from agricultural land use. First, an assessment model for evaluating agricultural land use intensity was established in this article, and the input-output indices of agricultural land intensive use were selected. The input-output indices of agricultural land intensive use were composed of labor input per unit of agricultural land, capital input per unit of agricultural land, technique input per unit of agricultural land, value-added of agriculture per unit of agricultural land, grain products per unit of agricultural land, income from household business per unit of agricultural land, and ammonia-nitrogen emission from agriculture per unit of agricultural land. Secondly, the intensity values of agricultural land intensive use in 31 provinces were computed. Thirdly, based on a slacks-based measure model, the input-output indices were established. The input-output indices applied in the slacks-based measure model were composed of labor input per unit of agricultural land, capital input per unit of agricultural land, technique input per unit of agricultural land, value-added of agriculture per ton of carbon emission, grain products per ton of carbon emission, income from household business per ton of carbon emission, and ammonia-nitrogen emission from agriculture per ton of carbon emission. Fourthly, this article calculated the total efficiency values, technical efficiency values, and scale efficiency values of carbon emission from agricultural land intensive use in 31 provinces and designed an input-output optimization of agricultural land intensive use. Lastly, low-carbon optimization strategies for agricultural land use in provinces whose total efficiencies of carbon emission were inefficient were put forward. The results showed that: 1) Consistency between agricultural land use intensity and its efficiency of carbon emissions does not exist widely in China, and the provinces whose intensity values of agricultural land use are large are mainly located in eastern China and the traditional farming zone. 2) The provinces whose total efficiencies of carbon emission from agricultural land intensive use are DEA efficient were mainly distributed in western China, and the total efficiencies of provinces in the Yangtze Delta, the Zhujiang Delta and Jing-Jin-Ji Megalopolis which are in an economically developed area are widely low. 3) The main reason for the low total efficiency was the imperfect technical efficiency of carbon emissions from agricultural land intensive use, and the imperfect scale efficiency had little effect on the low total efficiency. 4) In order to improve the total efficiency of carbon emissions from agricultural land intensive use, some measures should be adopted according to the local features of agricultural land use and the economy. These measures mainly consist of transferring agricultural labor, controlling carbon sources input, developing low-carbon and high-output agriculture, etc. Effective measures can be applied to control the carbon emissions from agricultural land use, and also can be added to the good outputs which contain added value of agriculture, grain output, and income from increased household business. of course, the emissions of ammonia nitrogen discharged from agriculture can also be reduced by improving agricultural land use.

A Study on the Total Quantity Control of Regional Livestock Rising:Based on the N/P Capacity of Land

A Study of Rural Livestock and Poultry Breeding Pollution Problems in China’s Urbanization Process

Costs of an Environmental Regulation in Livestock Farming: Evidence from Pig Production in Rural China

Controlling non-point-source pollution by rural resource recycling. Nitrogen runoff in Tai Lake valley, China, as an example

[Pollutant Production and Discharge from Livestock and Poultry Industries and Land Carrying Capacity in Zhejiang Province].

A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS ON THE OPTIMAL SCALE OF LIVESTOCK FARM: A PERSPECTIVE OF POLLUTION CONTROLLING

Differentiated discharge patterns, causes and prevention measures of rural non-point source pollution in the four economic regions of mainland China

Rebuilding the Linkage Between Livestock and Cropland to Mitigate Agricultural Pollution in China

Analysis of the Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Livestock and Poultry Farming Pollution and Assessment of the Environmental Pollution Load in Anhui Province

The land carrying capacity and environmental risk assessment of livestock and poultry breeding considering crop planting

High-resolution based sustainable livestock management in China

Analysis of Pollution Characters of the Livestock and Poultry Breeding and Effects of Pollution Control in Heavily Polluted Area of Taihu Lake Basin

Analysis of carbon emission efficiency and optimization of low carbon for agricultural land intensive use

Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of livestock manure nutrient in the soil environment of the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018

Scenario Analysis of Livestock Carrying Capacity Risk in Farmland from the Perspective of Planting and Breeding Balance in Northeast China

Study on Measures and Policies to Reduce Pollution in Raising Livestock and Poultry in Jiangsu Province

Research on Sustainable Development in an Alpine Pastoral Area Based on Equilibrium Analysis Between the Grassland Yield, Livestock Carrying Capacity, and Animal Husbandry Population

Redeploy manure resources to enhance the agro-pastoral cycle

Influencing mechanism of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies of livestock sector in developed regions of eastern China: a case study of Jiangsu province

Integrated livestock sector nitrogen pollution abatement measures could generate net benefits for human and ecosystem health in China

Alleviating environmental pressure from livestock production: A "livestock-resource environmental carrying capacity" perspective in China