Abstract:There is a dilemma between raising the intensive use level of agricultural land and controlling carbon emissions from agricultural land use. Carbon emissions from agricultural land use can be considered as a cost, and the suitable intensive use level of agricultural land should acquire a good efficiency of carbon emissions from agricultural land use. First, an assessment model for evaluating agricultural land use intensity was established in this article, and the input-output indices of agricultural land intensive use were selected. The input-output indices of agricultural land intensive use were composed of labor input per unit of agricultural land, capital input per unit of agricultural land, technique input per unit of agricultural land, value-added of agriculture per unit of agricultural land, grain products per unit of agricultural land, income from household business per unit of agricultural land, and ammonia-nitrogen emission from agriculture per unit of agricultural land. Secondly, the intensity values of agricultural land intensive use in 31 provinces were computed. Thirdly, based on a slacks-based measure model, the input-output indices were established. The input-output indices applied in the slacks-based measure model were composed of labor input per unit of agricultural land, capital input per unit of agricultural land, technique input per unit of agricultural land, value-added of agriculture per ton of carbon emission, grain products per ton of carbon emission, income from household business per ton of carbon emission, and ammonia-nitrogen emission from agriculture per ton of carbon emission. Fourthly, this article calculated the total efficiency values, technical efficiency values, and scale efficiency values of carbon emission from agricultural land intensive use in 31 provinces and designed an input-output optimization of agricultural land intensive use. Lastly, low-carbon optimization strategies for agricultural land use in provinces whose total efficiencies of carbon emission were inefficient were put forward. The results showed that: 1) Consistency between agricultural land use intensity and its efficiency of carbon emissions does not exist widely in China, and the provinces whose intensity values of agricultural land use are large are mainly located in eastern China and the traditional farming zone. 2) The provinces whose total efficiencies of carbon emission from agricultural land intensive use are DEA efficient were mainly distributed in western China, and the total efficiencies of provinces in the Yangtze Delta, the Zhujiang Delta and Jing-Jin-Ji Megalopolis which are in an economically developed area are widely low. 3) The main reason for the low total efficiency was the imperfect technical efficiency of carbon emissions from agricultural land intensive use, and the imperfect scale efficiency had little effect on the low total efficiency. 4) In order to improve the total efficiency of carbon emissions from agricultural land intensive use, some measures should be adopted according to the local features of agricultural land use and the economy. These measures mainly consist of transferring agricultural labor, controlling carbon sources input, developing low-carbon and high-output agriculture, etc. Effective measures can be applied to control the carbon emissions from agricultural land use, and also can be added to the good outputs which contain added value of agriculture, grain output, and income from increased household business. of course, the emissions of ammonia nitrogen discharged from agriculture can also be reduced by improving agricultural land use.

Evaluation of Comprehensive Land Use Efficiency Based on TOPSIS

Study on Land-Use Efficiency Evaluation of Development Zones Based on DEA—Take Hi-Tech Zones as an Example

Assessment of eco-efficiency of land use based on DEA

Analysis of carbon emission efficiency and optimization of low carbon for agricultural land intensive use

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON URBAN LAND USE EFFICIENCY

A New Approach to Peri-Urban Area Land Use Efficiency Identification Using Multi-Source Datasets: A Case Study in 36 Chinese Metropolitan Areas

EVALUATION OF LAND USE EFFICIENCY --A CASE STUDY OF JIANGNING COUNTY

Carbon Emission Efficiency and Low Carbon Optimization of Land Use: Based on the Perspective of Energy Consumption

Coordination evaluation between land use and regional development based on PCA_TOPSIS

Efficiency Evaluation on Urban Land Use Based on the Gray Correlation TOPSIS Method and Diagnosis of Its Obstacle Indicators

Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Water Use Efficiency in China

Land Use Efficiency and Regional Differentiation in Shenzhen City,China

Trade-off Efficiency: Linking Urban Socioecological Quality with Land Use Efficiency from Return on Investment Perspective

Determination and Comprehensive Evaluation of Land Use Benefit in Chaohu Basin

The Index System for Land Use Evaluation in National Development Zones

Evaluation and Analysis of Land Input-Output Comprehensive Benefit Based on Fuzzy Mathematics and Analytic Hierarchy Process

Comprehensive Measurement and Obstacle Diagnosis on Efficiency of Urban Land Use in Jiangsu Province

SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE EFFICIENCY IN JIANGSU PROVINCE

The Impact of Land Use Structure Change on Utilization Performance in Henan Province, China

Comparison of Using Efficiency of Agricultural Auxiliary Resources in Anhui Province

Evaluating the Coordination Between Land Use and Regional Development Based on TOPSIS Method——A Case Study of Suzhou City,Anhui Province