Doubts about "the Representation of Zircon U-Pb Age to the Emplacement Age of Granite" : Evidence of Comparision Between the Zircon U-Pb Ages and the Whole-Rock Rb-Sr Ages of Granite Plutons

章邦桐,吴俊奇,凌洪飞,陈培荣
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2008.06.006
2008-01-01
Abstract:The frequency analysis of 64 coupled age differences(Δt= tZr-tRb)between the zircon U-Pb age(tZr)and whole rock Rb-Sr age(tRb)for granite plutons shows that theΔt histogram displays a symmetrical normal distribution(skewness CSK=0.150;kutrocess CKU=4.274);theΔt are both positive and negative with mode 2.0Ma,but far less than the period of cooling—crystallization(16 Ma)of a granitic batholith.Using least squares regression procedure,a best regression equation(tRb =0.99354tZr +2.15163)with high correlation coefficient(r=0.997)is fitted to the 64 points of the zircon U-Pb age and the whole rock Rb-Sr age for granite plutons.The constant of this regression equation(2.15163Ma)is consistent with theΔt mode(2.0Ma)for the main.These statistical characteristics indicate that the zircon U-Pb dating age is corresponded with the whole-rock Rb-Sr isochron age for granite as a whole and the zircon U-Pb dating age cannot represents the emplacement age of a granite batholith.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?