Randomized Controlled Trial of Tacrolimus Versus Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in the Induction Therapy of Class Ⅴ Plus Ⅳ Lupus Nephritis

ZHANG Haitao,HU Weixin,XIE Honglang,ZENG Caihong,CHEN Huiping,LIU Zhihong,LI Leishi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-298x.2006.06.002
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506) as the induction therapy in patients with class Ⅴ plus Ⅳ lupus nephritis (LN). Methodology:Thirty-seven female patients diagnosed class Ⅴ+Ⅳ LN (according to ISN/RPS 2003 classification criteria) were randomly assigned to either FK506 0.1 mg/(kg·d) for 6 months (n=19) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (CTX) 0.5-1.0 g/m~2 BSA monthly for 6 months (n=18) in addition to corticosteroids. The primary end point was complete remission (CR) at 6 months (defined as a value of proteinuria 0.4 g/24h with normal urinary sediment, serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dl and a normal value of serum creatinine or no more than 15% above the base-line values). A secondary end point was partial remission (PR) and remission at 6 months. Results:1) Clinical efficacy: 31 patients (K506 group=15, CTX group=16) completed the 6 months induction therapy. The remission occurred in 14 out of 15 patients in the FK506 group and 8 out of 16 patients in the CTX group (P=0.015). There were 4 patients (26.7%) in the FK506 group and 1 patient (6.3%) in the CTX group that achieved CR (P0.05). The improvements in SLE-DAI, serum albumin and serum complement were similar in both groups, but there was no change of urine RBC and anti-dsDNA. The average proteinuria of post-treatment was significantly decreased in the FK506 group while with no improvement in the CTX group. 2) Dosage of FK506 and adverse effects: The inducement dosage of FK506 was 0.086~0.091 mg/(kg·d) and the average trough blood concentration was 6.6~8.1 ng/ml. No damage in the renal tubular function was found under this dosage. 5 patients dropped out because of adverse effects (2 in the CTX group, 3 in the FK506 group) and one had no follow-up in FK506 group. The adverse effects of infection, temporary GPT/GOT rise, upper gastrointestinal symptoms, leucopenia and irregular menstruation/amenorrhea were lower in the FK506 group than that in the CTX group, especially the adverse effects of irregular menstruation/ amenorrhea. In contrast, elevated blood pressure and hyperglycemia were higher in the FK506 group with no statistics significance. Conclusion:FK506 was more effective than CTX as the inducing treatment in patients with class Ⅴ plus Ⅳ LN and had adverse effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?