Efficacy and Safety of Tangshen Formula on Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Multicenter Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Ping Li,Yiping Chen,Jianping Liu,Jing Hong,Yueyi Deng,Fang Yang,Xiuping Jin,Jing Gao,Jing Li,Hui Fang,Geling Liu,Liping Shi,Jinhang Du,Yang Li,Meihua Yan,Yumin Wen,Wenying Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126027
IF: 3.7
2015-05-04
PLoS ONE
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Persons with diabetes are at high risk of developing diabetic kidney disease (DKD), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current drug therapies for DKD, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are not entirely satisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the additional benefit and safety of the Chinese herbal granule Tangshen Formula (TSF) in treating DKD.METHODS: The study was designed as a six-center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. From April 2007 through December 2009, 180 patients with DKD were enrolled. In addition to conventional treatment with ACEIs or ARBs, 122 participants were randomly assigned to receive TSF and 58 participants to receive placebo for 24 weeks. Primary outcome was urinary protein level, measured by urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) for participants with microalbuminuria, 24-hour urinary protein (24h UP) for participants with macroalbuminuria. Secondary outcomes included renal function, serum lipids, quality of life, symptoms, and adverse events.FINDINGS: After 24 weeks of treatment, no statistically significant difference in UAER (TSF -19.53 μg/min compared with placebo -7.01 μg/min, with a mean difference of -12.52 μg/min; 95%CI, -68.67 to 43.63, P = 0.696) was found between TSF and placebo groups. However, TSF displayed a statistically significant decrease in 24h UP (TSF-0.21 g compared with placebo 0.36 g, with a mean difference of -0.57g; 95%CI, -1.05 to -0.09, P = 0.024). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was improved in both patients with microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria, with a mean difference of 15.51 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI, 3.71 to 27.31), 9.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI, -0.10 to 18.13), respectively. Other secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between groups or in the incidence of adverse events.CONCLUSIONS: Based on conventional treatments, TSF appears to provide additional benefits compared with placebo in decreasing proteinuria and improving eGFR in DKD patients with macroalbuminuria. Nevertheless, further study is needed to evaluate TSF treating patients with microalbuminuria.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-10000843.
multidisciplinary sciences