Abstract:In recent years,the problem of labor and labor-capital conflicts in China has caused deep concerns.Sociologists are confronted with the question of why the typical working class issue of labor-capital clash occurs in frequency in a socialist country but not in the developed capitalist countries.Should this phenomenon be regarded as normal social problems?Or a target area of social class analysis?How much is the relevance of the waning social class analysis of classical sociology to this issue?Through an in-depth literature review this paper suggests a state-centered interpretation that sees class and its conception as relational.The status as well as the nature of the working class has to be analyzed through a triangle relationship between workers,capitalists and the state.In a capitalist society,the state dominates this triangle relationship and is capable of shaping the working class and molding the relationship between labor and capital. The state does not behave merely as the stereotyped spokesman for the dominant class.How the state handles the relation between labor and capital determines the intensity of the conflicts and whether the working class acts as agitators or cooperators. Similarly, whether the sociological class analysis still has its potential in contemporary society is determined by the role and the policies of the state in dealing with the relation between labor and capital.By its action,the state can either help dissolve social antagonism and incorporate the working class into order and cooperation,or provoke workers’opposition.Under the former situation,the significance of sociological class analysis would become much less apparent,however,under the latter,class analysis is not just an appropriate theoretical analytic tool but also has great significance in practice.This perspective is also applicable to the working class issues in socialist countries.

Penetrating the Charm of Fetishism:The Dialectics of Class Consciousness and Daily Consciousness

The Dialectical Characteristics and Their Modern Significances of Karl Marx’s Critique of Fetishism

"Versachlichung","Verdinglichung" and "Fetischismus":Capital beyond Grundrisse

A Two-dimensional Analysis of Alienated Labor

Young Marx on Fetishism, Sexuality, and Religion: Revisiting the Bonn Notebooks

Alienation and fetishism in Karl Marx’s critique of political economy

On Marx' S Dialectic of Labor

On the Control of Capital

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

The Logic of Das Kapital and the Stance of Marxism

Workers,Capital and the State:A Relational Perspective on the Study of Working Class

Surplus Labor and Historical Materialism——Towards an Integrated Theory of Marxism

The way of Zizek altering Marx into Lacan——based on the analysis of fetishism theory of Zizek

Capital is about The Grand Theory of Market Power Structure:Also about the Basic Theory of Socialist Market Economy

Lacanized Interpretation of Marxist Commodity Fetishism from Zizek:No object,No subject

Basic Framework of Marxist Principles as a Whole

"On Capital" and the Microscopic Foundation of Historical Materialism:Taking Marx's Productivity Theory as Example

Unveiling Class Discourse: Its Articulation and Generation in Chinese Labor Struggles

State, Worker, and Identity Struggle: Look back on Marx

The Critique of Ideology and Historical Materialism——Reading Yu Wujin's On Ideology

Marxism And Ecology: Marx'S Theory Of Labour Process Revisited