Background and Aftermath of Fakhr al-Din Tibi's Voyage: A Resurvey of the Interaction between the Ilkhanate and the Yuan around 1298 AD
Yihao Qiu
2016-01-01
Abstract:In 1298 AD, Ghazan khan, ruler of the Ilkhanate, dispatched Fakhr al-Din Abmad Tibi as his ambassador to the Yuan Empire with a merchant fleet. The onward route of this missionary coincided with the return route of Marco Polo, and as the ortaq of Mongol khan, the status and experience of them were similar. However, compared with Marco Polo, Fakhr al-Din played a more important role, and the experience during his trip was more marvelous. This article tries to investigate Fakhr al-Din's mission with two focuses: the rise of the al-Tibi family; and the reconsideration of Fakhr al-Din's trip. In terms of the historical sources, the author utilizes some new versions of Tarikh-i Vassaf published recently, such as the photocopied edition of the manuscript collected by the Nuru Osmaniye Library and which was published in 2009. This manuscript originally belonged to the Rashid al-Din private library and was regarded as a version that is very close to the original edition. The author also referred to the new version edited by 'Ali Riza: Hajyan Najad, and some early manuscripts collected by the Library of Tehran University and the Library of Iran Parliament. Comparing with existing Chinese sources, the author provided a first-ever complete translation of the text. The author believes that Fakhr al-Din Abmad Tibi's family was one of the leading maritime traders under the Mongol ruler. After the 1260s, with the invasion of the Ilkhanate to the Persian Gulf, this family seized the opportunity to cooperate with the Mongols, in order to get rid of the competitors and expand their influence in the Persian Gulf region. Tibi's family then became the agent of Ilkhan in South Iran and as the ortaq merchant for the imperial households at the same time. Finally, under the rule of Jamal al-Din, Kish had become the pivot of a maritime trading network, spanning from China, India, the Persian Gulf to present day Yemen. Noting this in mind, Ghazan khan dispatched Fakhr al-Din as his ambassador to the Yuan dynasty. Vassaf's record of Fakhr al-Din's experience in China gives us a more concrete scene about the later period of Temur's reign. According to Vassaf's narrative, we can see that the government of the Yuan dynasty usually borrowed the Islamic administrative regulations from Ilkhanate to administer the Muslim merchants in China. Vassaf also mentioned the group of prime ministers surround the Qa'an. His report indicated that after empress Buluqan launched a political purge in 1303, nearly all the ministers served at the Central Secretariat were convicted and later demoted. The other valuable information from Vassaf was about the case of monopoly-trade in Temur Qa'an's court. This case can be regarded as the sequel of the jewelry fraud case that happened in 1298, which recorded by Rashid al-Din. Moreover, through the case of al-Tibi, we can observe the actual attitude of Temur Qa'an toward monopoly-trade and the inflation of paper money in 1304 concurs with the Chinese sources. Finally, the author also indicates that the Fakhr al-Din delegation was not an isolated event. We should consider this case in the context of the general peace agreement of the four Mongol khanates signed in 1304. With the agreement sealed, the rulers of the Mongol khanates tried to re-open the commercial routes inside the Mongol World Empire. During the Mongol era, this network influenced the cultural and commercial exchange between western and eastern Asia significantly. With the Pax Mongolica, the exchange of information and goods via maritime route played a crucial role in this era.