Abstract:In this paper,residual-based wild Bootstrap methods are applied for hypothesis testing of spatial correlation in a spatial autoregressive linear regression model.Based on the empirical distribution of Moran's I test statistic,the actual size and power of Bootstrap and asymptotic tests for spatial correlation are evaluated and compared.Under classical normality assumption of the model,the performance of the Bootstrap tests is equivalent to or better than that of the asymptotic tests in terms of size and power. For more realistic heterogeneous non-normal distributional models,size distortion of the asymptotic tests is far away from the theoretical zero value.Whereas,Bootstrap tests have shown superiority in smaller size distortion and higher power when compared to asymptotic counterparts.Monte Carlo experiments indicate that based on Moran's I test statistic,Bootstrap method is an effective alternative to the theoretical asymptotic approach,especially for cases with a small sample and dense spatial contiguity when the classical distributional assumption is not warranted in a spatial autoregressive model.

Bootstrap Moran's Ⅰ Test Statistic in Spatial Autoregressive Models