A multicentred clinical comparative study on curative effect and safety of acetic octreotide in treatment of esophageal varices bleeding

Chang-Qing Zhu,Sheng-Xiang Dong,Yi-Min Mao,Min-De Zeng,Yi-Bin Jiang,Jian-Ming Xu,De-An Tian,Ji-Yong Liu,San-Ping Xu,Ying Sun,He-Sheng Luo,Bing-Yuan Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-3079.2005.21.010
2005-01-01
World Chinese Journal of Digestology
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate curative effect and safety of acetic octreotide in the treatment of esophageal varices blee-ding (EVB) in comparison with octreotide (Sandostatin). METHODS: EVB patients were randomly and double- blinded assigned into acetic octreotide group (n = 70) and Sandostatin group (n = 66). Both kinds of drugs were dissolved in normal saline and then given to the patients at the rate of 50 mg/h for 48 h. The amount of bleeding and vital signs of all the patients were observed and comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The frequencies and amount of hemateme- sis, the excreted frequencies and amount of black feces were significantly different before and after treatment with both kinds of drugs (P <0.05), but there was no marked difference between the two groups (P >0.05). The vital signs such as heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as symptoms of nausea, swirling, heart-throb, sweatiness, and thirst were notably improved after treatment (P <0.05), but there was still no obvious difference between the two groups (P >0.05). Adverse drug reaction was not significantly different between the two groups (1.43% vs 1.52%, P >0.05). The total effective rates in acetic octreotide and Sandostatin group were 97.14% and 92.42%, respectively (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: Acetic octreotide is safe and effective in the treatment of EVB, and its effect is not significan- tly different from Sandostatin’s.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?