Up-regulation of IL-1 receptor type I and tyrosine hydroxylase in the rat carotid body following intraperitoneal injection of IL-1β

Xi-Jing Zhang,Xi Wang,Li-Ze Xiong,Juan Fan,Xiao-Li Duan,Bai-Ren Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-007-0346-y
2007-01-01
Histochemistry and Cell Biology
Abstract:It is well established that reciprocal modulation exists between the central nervous system and immune system. Interleukin (IL)-1β, a proinflammatory cytokine secreted at early stage of immune challenge, has been recognized as one of the informational molecules in immune-to-brain communication. However, how this large molecule is transmitted to the brain is still unknown. In recent years it has been reported that the cranial nerves, especially the vagus, may play a pivotal role in this regard. It is proposed that IL-1β may bind to its corresponding receptors located in the glomus cells of the vagal paraganglia and then elicit action potentials in the nerve. The existence of IL-1 receptor type I (IL-1RI) in the vagal paraganglia has been shown. The carotid body, which is the largest peripheral chemoreceptive organ, is also a paraganglion. We hypothesize that the carotid body might play a role similar to the vagal paraganglia because they are architectonically similar. Recently we verified the presence of IL-1RI in the rat carotid body and observed increase firing in the carotid sinus nerve following IL-1β stimulation. The aim of this study was to observe the changes in expression of IL-1RI and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a rate-limiting enzyme for catecholamine synthesis, in the glomus cells of the rat carotid body following intraperitoneal injection of IL-1β. The radioimmunoassay result showed that the blood IL-1β level was increased after the intraperitoneal injection of rmIL-1β (750 ng/kg) from 0.48 ± 0.08 to 0.78 ± 0.07 ng/ml ( P < 0.05). Immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis showed that the expression of IL-1RI and TH in the rat carotid body was increased significantly following peritoneal IL-1β stimulation. In addition, double immunofluorescence labeling for TH and PGP9.5, a marker for glomus cells, or TH immunofluoresence with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) counterstaining revealed that a considerable number of glomus cells did not display TH immunoreactivity. These data provide morphological evidence for the response of the carotid body to proinflammatory cytokine stimulation. The results also indicate that not all of the glomus cells express detectable TH levels either in normal or in some abnormal conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?