A comparative study of three CT and MRI registration algorithms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Xiaoshen Wang,Longgen Li,Chaosu Hu,Jianjian Qiu,Zhiyong Xu,Yan Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v10i2.2906
2009-01-01
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the image registration accuracy and efficiency of CT and MRI fusion using three algorithms in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and materials: Twelve sets of CT and MRI scans of 12 NPC patients were fused using three image registration algorithms, respectively: Mark-and-link, Interactive, and Normalized Mutual Information (NMI). Registration accuracy was evaluated by performing statistical analysis of the coordinate differences between CT and MR anatomical landmarks along the x-, y- and z-axes. The time required to complete the registration process using three algorithms was also recorded. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the difference of the three registration methods. Results: The mean time required for CT/MRI registration using the three different registration algorithms, mark-and-link, interactive, and NMI, was 6.25 min, 5.25 min, and 5.15 min, respectively. The mark-and-link method was more time consuming (F=8.74, p=0.001); however no statistical difference was found between the time required using interactive and NMI methods (p=0.77). Mean registration errors of the three methods along the x- axis were 0.66 mm, 0.70 mm, and 0.68 mm, respectively (F=0.09, p=0.91). Along the y- axis, the mean registration errors were 1.03 mm, 1.04 mm, and 1.03 mm, respectively (F=0.02, p=0.98). Along the z-axis, they were 0.58 mm, 0.64 mm, and 0.56 mm, respectively (F=0.21, p=0.81). Conclusions: All three registration algorithms, mark-and-link, interactive, and NMI, can provide accurate CT/MRI registration. However the mark-and-link method was most time consuming.