Abstract:It is likely that antiferromagnetism has a role in the superconductivity of iron arsenide. But is the magnetism local, as described by the Heisenberg model, or itinerant, which is more in agreement with the Stoner model? The answer is both. Antiferromagnetism is relevant to high-temperature (high-Tc) superconductivity because copper oxide and iron arsenide superconductors arise from electron- or hole-doping of their antiferromagnetic parent compounds1,2,3,4,5,6. There are two broad classes of explanation for antiferromagnetism: in the ‘local moment’ picture, appropriate for the insulating copper oxides1, antiferromagnetic interactions are well described by a Heisenberg Hamiltonian7,8; whereas in the ‘itinerant model’, suitable for metallic chromium, antiferromagnetic order arises from quasiparticle excitations of a nested Fermi surface9,10. There has been contradictory evidence regarding the microscopic origin of the antiferromagnetic order in iron arsenide materials5,6, with some favouring a localized picture11,12,13,14,15 and others supporting an itinerant point of view16,17,18,19,20. More importantly, there has not even been agreement about the simplest effective ground-state Hamiltonian necessary to describe the antiferromagnetic order21,22,23,24,25. Here, we use inelastic neutron scattering to map spin-wave excitations in CaFe2As2 (refs 26, 27), a parent compound of the iron arsenide family of superconductors. We find that the spin waves in the entire Brillouin zone can be described by an effective three-dimensional local-moment Heisenberg Hamiltonian, but the large in-plane anisotropy cannot. Therefore, magnetism in the parent compounds of iron arsenide superconductors is neither purely local nor purely itinerant, rather it is a complicated mix of the two.

Competitions of Magnetism and Superconductivity in FeAs-based Materials

Effect of bond length and radius on superconducting transition temperature for FeAs-based superconductors

Effect of Co Doping on Superconductivity and Transport Properties in SmFe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$AsO

Nodal Spin Density Wave and Band Topology of the FeAs-based Materials

Competing Ferromagnetism And Superconductivity On Feas Layers In Eufe2(As0.73p0.27)(2)

Coexistence of ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism, and superconductivity in magnetically anisotropic (Eu,La)FeAs2

Competition Of 3d/4f Orbitals Due To Competing Conductivity And Ferromagnetism In Fe/Coas Layers In Eu(Fe0.89co0.11)(2)As-2

Vortex States in Iron-Based Superconductors with Collinear Antiferromagnetic Cores

Coexistence of Static Magnetism and Superconductivity in SmFeAsO1−xFx As Revealed by Muon Spin Rotation

Dynamic competition between spin-density wave order and superconductivity in underdoped Ba 1− x K x Fe 2 As 2

Impurity Scattering Effect on Superconductivity and the Violation of Anderson Theorem in Ba(Fe_{1-x}Co_x)_2As_2 Single Crystals

The synthesis of new FeAs-based superconductors

Spin waves and magnetic exchange interactions in CaFe2As2

Transition from Three-Dimensional Anisotropic Spin Excitations to Two-Dimensional Spin Excitations by Electron Doping the FeAs-based BaFe1.96Ni0.04As2 Superconductor.

Constraints on the Possible Pairing Symmetry of Iron Arsenide Superconductors in A Two-Orbital Model

Functional Renormalization-Group Study of the Pairing Symmetry and Pairing Mechanism of the FeAs-Based High-Temperature Superconductor

Visualizing the Microscopic Coexistence of Spin Density Wave and Superconductivity in Underdoped NaFe1−xCoxAs

Preferred Magnetic Excitations in the Iron-Based Sr1-xNaxFe2As2 Superconductor

Tunneling spectroscopy of $sπ$ pairing state as a model for FeAs superconductors

Coexistence of the Spini-Density-wave and Superconductivity in the Ba1-xKxFe2As2

Magnetization Relaxation and Collective Vortex Pinning in the Fe-based Superconductorsmfeaso0.9f0.1