Abstract:Comparative genomic in situ hybridization (CGH) provides a new possibility for searching genomes for imbalanced genetic material. Labeled genomic test DNA, prepared from clinical or tumor specimens, is mixed with differently labeled control DNA prepared from cells with normal chromosome complements. The mixed probe is used for chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization to normal metaphase spreads (CGH-metaphase spreads). Hybridized test and control DNA sequences are detected via different fluorochromes, e.g., fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and tetraethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC). The ratios of FITC/TRITC fluorescence intensities for each chromosome or chromosome segment should then reflect its relative copy number in the test genome compared with the control genome, e.g., 0.5 for monosomies, 1 for disomies, 1.5 for trisomies, etc. Initially, model experiments were designed to test the accuracy of fluorescence ratio measurements on single chromosomes. DNAs from up to five human chromosome-specific plasmid libraries were labeled with biotin and digoxigenin in different hapten proportions. Probe mixtures were used for CISS hybridization to normal human metaphase spreads and detected with FITC and TRITC. An epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled charge coupled device (CCD) camera was used for image acquisition. Procedures for fluorescence ratio measurements were developed on the basis of commercial image analysis software. For hapten ratios 4/1, 1/1 and 1/4, fluorescence ratio values measured for individual chromosomes could be used as a single reliable parameter for chromosome identification. Our findings indicate (1) a tight correlation of fluorescence ratio values with hapten ratios, and (2) the potential of fluorescence ratio measurements for multiple color chromosome painting. Subsequently, genomic test DNAs, prepared from a patient with Down syndrome, from blood of a patient with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, and from cultured cells of a renal papillary carcinoma cell line, were applied in CGH experiments. As expected, significant differences in the fluorescence ratios could be measured for chromosome types present in different copy numbers in these test genomes, including a trisomy of chromosome 21, the smallest autosome of the human complement. In addition, chromosome material involved in partial gains and losses of the different tumors could be mapped to their normal chromosome counterparts in CGH-metaphase spreads. An alternative and simpler evaluation procedure based on visual inspection of CCD images of CGH-metaphase spreads also yielded consistent results from several independent observers. Pitfalls, methodological improvements, and potential applications of CGH analyses are discussed.

Karyotyping of Comparative Genomic Hybridization Human Metaphases by Using Support Vector Machines

Karyotyping of Comparative Genomic Hybridization Human Metaphases Using Kernel Nearest-Neighbor Algorithm

[The Application of Dual-Color Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization to the Diagnosis of Klinefelter Syndrome].

Chromosome Classification and Straightening Based on an Interleaved and Multi-Task Network

Automated pairing of human chromosomes applying gradient profile and similarity matching algorithm

Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization

Statistical Karyotype Analysis Using Cnn And Geometric Optimization

Enhanced Rotated Mask R-CNN for Chromosome Segmentation.

Karyotyping of human chromosomes in metaphase images using faster R‐CNN and inception models

High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays

Research on automatic human chromosome image analysis

Classification of arrayCGH data using a fused SVM

KaryoXpert: An accurate chromosome segmentation and classification framework for karyotyping analysis without training with manually labeled metaphase-image mask annotations

Advancement in Study on Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Chromosome classification via deep learning and its application to patients with structural abnormalities of chromosomes

A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly.

Detection of Human Chromosomal Abnormalities Using a New Technique Combining 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenyl‐indole Staining and Image Analysis

Automated Classification and Cluster Visualization of Genotypes Derived from High Resolution Melt Curves

Enhanced label constrained contrastive learning for chromosome optical microscopic image classification

Chromosome Segmentation Analysis Using Image Processing Techniques and Autoencoders

Manually-established abnormal karyotype dataset based on normal chromosomes effectively train artificial intelligence model for better cytogenetic abnormalities prediction