EPO RESPONSE TO 24 HRS OF ARTIFICIAL HYPOBARIC HYPOXIA PREDICTS EPO RESPONSE TO NATURAL ALTITUDE

T. Karlsen,G. K. Resaland,G. Ri-Li,M. Sivieri,S. Witowski,R. Yates,B. D. Levine,J. Stray-Gundersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200105001-00556
2001-01-01
Abstract:There is substantial individual variation in the response to moderate altitude. Earlier we demonstrated that a robust increase in EPO after 24 hours of natural altitude (2454m) was associated with an increase in red cell mass and an improvement in sea level running performance. We hypothesized that an overnight stay in artificial hypobaric hypoxia would predict the individual erythropoeitic response to natural altitude. We recruited 46 collegiate distance runners (16 women, 165 ± 6 cm, 56 ± 5 kg and 30 men, 179 ± 6 cm, 69 ± 7 kg) to spend 24 hrs in a hypobaric chamber once per week at 4 different simulated altitudes (1780m, 2085m, 2454m, and 2805m). Then they were randomly assigned to ascend to one of the same 4 natural altitudes. Subjects were sedentary in the chamber, while in the first 24 hours of natural altitude they participated in an easy 30–40 min run and/or carried out light activities of daily living (ADL's). Venous blood was drawn prior to and after 24 hours in the chamber and before, 24 hours after ascent to natural altitude. Serum was analyzed for EPO by Immulite assay (DPC, LA, CA). A sea level baseline was calculated as the average of resting morning values over the 3 weeks prior to ascent. A “delta chamber” variable was calculated as the difference between the mean baseline and the EPO value obtained after 24 hours of exposure converted to a percent of baseline. A “delta altitude” variable was constructed as the difference between the mean sea level baseline and the morning after ascent and converted to a percent of baseline. Correlation analyses were performed. Results: There was a significant increase in serum EPO to 24 hours exposure at all altitudes both natural and artificial. The increase was significantly greater at 2454m and 2805m than 1780m and 2085m in the chamber, while in natural altitude, the groups assigned to 2085m, 2454m and 2805m demonstrated a larger response than the 1800m group. There was no difference in percent change in the mild EPO response after 24 hours at 1780m between artificial and natural hypobaric hypoxia (42 ± 34\% vs. 55 ± 38\%). The percent change in EPO response after 24 hours at 2085m was significantly different between artificial and natural hypobaric hypoxia (41 ± 40\% vs. 81 ± 55\%*). There were no differences in percent change in the more robust EPO response after 24 hours between artificial and natural hypobaric hypoxia at 2454m and 2805m (2454m = 81 ± 67\% vs. 92 ± 50\%; 2805m = 98 ± 85\% vs. 74 ± 54\%). Correlation analyses demonstrated significant relationships between artificial and natural 24 hour responses at 2085m, 2454m and 2805m, but not at 1780m. We conclude that if the subject has a robust response to chamber exposure, then they will respond similarly to the same natural altitude. We speculate that the difference in response between chamber and natural altitude after 24 hours at 2085m may be due to the additional hypoxia induced by normal activities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?