Ultrasonographic features of radial nerve injury resulting from pediatric Monteggia fracture
JIANG Jun,CHEN Ya-qing,LIU Wei-yong,ZHAO Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011.11.016
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the features of radial nerve injury resulting from pediatric Monteggia fracture by ultrasonography.Methods Ultrasonography examination was performed in 18 pediatric patients who were diagnosed as radial nerve injury caused by Monteggia fracture.Four ultrasonographic planes were defined:A,midway in the upper arm;B,in lower one-third of the upper arm;C,articulatio cubiti;D,in upper one-forth of the forearm.The ultrasonic measurement of cross-sectional area(cross-sectional area,CSA) and the distances among the trunk,superficial branch and deep branch of radial nerve and skin(distance between the radial nerve and skin,RN-S;distance between the superficial branch of the radial nerve and skin,RNS-S;distance between the deep branch of the radial nerve and skin,RND-S) were achieved from both the affected sides and the normal side in the four planes.The diagnostic coincidence rate of radial nerve injury and the detectable rate of traumatic neuroma and encasing scar by ultrasonography were calculated.Results The injured radial nerves were appeared as swelling and hypoechoic nerves partly with traumatic neuroma and encasing scar.The CSAs of the normal radial nerve in plane A,B,C and D were(6.32±1.05)mm2,(7.05±1.12)mm2,(3.07±0.42)mm2,(3.21±0.45)mm2,(2.87±0.92)mm2 and(3.01±0.77)mm2,respectively.The CSAs of the affected radial nerve in plane A,B,C and D were(6.53±0.79)mm2,(9.31±2.39)mm2,(4.21±0.45)mm2,(5.64±1.16)mm2,(4.39±0.67)mm2 and(3.61±1.24)mm2,respectively.No significant difference of CSA was found between the normal side and the affected side of radial nerve in plane A(P>0.05).The CSA of radial nerve trunk,deep branch of the radial nerve and superficial branch of the radial nerve in affected side were thickener than the normal side in plane B and C(t=3.20,6.92,7.33,4.99,P<0.05).In plane D,the superficial branch of the radial nerve in affected side was thickener than the normal side(P<0.05),while the deep branch of the radial nerve was not thickener than the normal side(P<0.05).The RN-S,RNS-S and RND-S of the normal side in plane A,B,C and D were(15.42±2.60)mm,(9.96±1.22)mm,(10.03±2.85)mm,(11.21±2.94)mm,(10.27±2.52)mm and(11.31±2.71)mm,respectively.The RN-S,RNS-S and RND-S of the affected side in plane A,B,C and D were(15.92±1.29)mm,(7.65±1.07)mm,(3.66±1.83)mm,(4.47±1.22)mm,(9.94±3.32)mm and(10.20±2.42)mm,respectively.There was no difference between the normal and the affected side of RN-S in plane A as well as RNS-S and RND-S in plane D(P>0.05).The RN-S in plane B and the nerves in plane C were smaller in the affected side than the normal side(t=4.31,7.24,8.62,P<0.05).The coincidence rate of ultrasonography in diagnosing radial nerve injury was higher than electromyogram examination.The detectable rate of traumatic neuroma and encasing scar by ultrasonography were 2/2 and 6/7.Conclusion Ultrasonography could clearly demonstrate the swelling and shifting of the injured radial nerve,and detect the traumatic neuroma and encasing the scar sensitively caused by pediatric monteggia fracture.