Uranium (VI) Reduction by Denitrifying Biomass

Wei-Min Wu,Baohua Gu,Matthew W. Fields,Margaret Gentile,Yee-Kyoung Ku,Hui Yan,Sonia Tiquias,Tingfen Yan,Jennifer Nyman,Jizhong Zhou,Phillip M. Jardine,Craig S. Criddle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10889860590929628
2005-01-01
Bioremediation Journal
Abstract:ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Groundwater near the S3 ponds at the US Department of Energy's Y-12 site in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, is contaminated by high levels of nitrate (up to 160 mM) and U(VI) (∼0.3 mM). To minimize nitrate inhibition, the authors proposed extraction of contaminated groundwater, nitrate removal in a denitrifying fluidized bed bioreactor (FBR), and return of nitrate-free effluent to the aquifer to stimulate in situ microbial reduction of U(VI). In the presence of carbonate, U(VI) sorption to biomass was negligible, but in its absence, sorption was significant. Biomass reduced U(VI) to U(IV), exhibiting slow first-order removal with respect to U(VI). Addition of electron donor increased rates. Addition of an inhibitor of sulfate reduction (molybdate) slowed the rate and inhibited sulfate reduction. Denitrifying β-Proteobacteria dominated clone libraries of SSU rRNA and dsrA gene sequences. Approximately 10% were low-G+C microorganisms that had 90% to 92% sequence identity with Sporomusa, Acetonema, and Propionispora. The dsrA sequences were dominated by a single clone with ∼80% nucleotide identity to dsrA of Desulfovibrio vulgaris sub sp. oxamicus. The authors conclude that some members of this denitrifyng community reduce uranium, and that sulfate-reducing bacteria likely contribute to this capability. KEYWORDS: denitrificationfluidized bed reactormicroorganismsuranium reduction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?