Effect of Inhibin DNA Vaccine Harboring Two Copies of Inhibin Gene on Follicle Development, Production and Reproductive Hormones in Rats

WANG Shui-lian,XUE Li-qun,XING Zhao-fang,CHEN Xiao-jun,YANG Li-guo
2012-01-01
Abstract:Ninety rats were randomly assigned to five dosage groups of 18 each(T1,T2,T3,V,S,which was immunized with 10,50,100 μg·100 μL-1of pCISI,100 μg pcMV-S and 100 μL physiological saline per rat,respectively) to investigate the effect of double copies inhibin pcISI gene immunization on follicle development,production and reproductive hormones without any immune adjuvant.The results showed that the booster immunization could improve P/N value of antibody against inhibin,the average P/N value of antibody against inhibin of different dosages groups was higher than 2 after booster immunization,and the antibody level against inhibin in T3 group was higher than that in T1 and T2(P 0.05) groups.Number of the mature follicles in the T3 group was higher than that in the control groups(P0.05).The rats with positive antibodies had more 12.45 in number of mature follicles than that of rats with negative antibodies(P0.05).In contrast to the control groups,litter sizes and number of the placentas were increased significantly in the pcISI immunization groups except for T1 group(P0.05).5.09 more placentas and 5.39 more litter sizes on average were also found in the positive-antibody rats than those in the negative-antibody rats(P0.05).The levels of follicle stimulating hormone(FSH) and estradiol(E2) in the plasma of rats immunized with different dosages of pcISI plasmids were higher than that of the control animals,FSH and E2 levels in T3 group was higher than that in control group(P0.05,P0.01),there was no significant difference in P4 levels between different dosages groups and control group was observated(P0.05).These findings demonstrate that double copies inhibin pcISI gene can enhance the immune response,stimulate FSH secretion and follicle development,improve the litter size without any immune adjuvant.The immune dosage of 100 μg·100 μL-1 is the optimum dosage in the study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?