Abstract:Loorits (2014) identifies the solution to the hard problem of consciousness in the possibility of fully analyzing seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness in structural terms. However, research on consciousness conducted in recent decades has failed to bridge the explanatory gap between the brain and conscious mind. One reason why the explanatory gap cannot be filled, and consequently the problem remains hard, is that experience and neural structure are too different or "distant" to be directly compatible. Conversely, structural aspects of consciousness can be found in phenomenal experience. One possible alternative, therefore, is to seek the structure of seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness not in the neural substrate, but within consciousness itself, through a phenomenal analysis of the qualitative aspects of experience, starting from its simplest forms. An essential premise is to reformulate the explanandum of consciousness, which is usually attributed to qualia and what it is like to be in a certain state. However, these properties do not allow us to identify the fundamental aspects of phenomenal experience. Sensations such as the redness of red or the painfulness of pain are inseparable from the context of the experience to which they belong, making qualia appear as phenomenal artifacts. Furthermore, the simplest qualitative aspects can be found in early vision. They are involved in perceptual organization and necessarily have relational significance. The unitary set of qualities found in early vision—such as those related to being an object, background or detail—constitutes the explanandum of the simplest forms of consciousness and seems to imply a justifying structure. Although early vision is characterized by interdependent qualitative components that form a unitary whole, we cannot find in it the structure of seemingly non-structural aspects of consciousness. Phenomenal appearance alone does not seem sufficient to identify a unitary structure of consciousness. However, the closeness of these characteristics to a unitary structure prompts us to delve into less explored territory, using the components of experience also as possible explanans.

Elements of Husserl's Early Analysis of the Internal Time-consciousness

Longitudinal-Intentionality:Time, Genesis, History——Husserl’s Understanding of their Immanent Relationship

The Conception of Retention in Husserl's Phenomenological Analysis of Internal Time-Consciousness

Horizontal-Intention: Time, Genesis, History - Husserl'S Understanding Of Their Immanent Relationship

Discussion about the Triple Foundational Relationship between Intellect, Emotion, and Willing from the Perspective of the Phenomenology of Consciousness

How to Analyze (Intentional) Consciousness in Terms of Meta-Belief and Temporal Awareness

Consciousness,Awareness and Reflection

The Analysis of Consciousness in Husserl’ s Phenomenology

Temporality and Egology in Husserl' Phenomenology

Awareness and Its Reflexive Structure——On the Phenomenal Nature of Consciousness

The Phenomenological-Ontological Dimension of Philosophy of History: the Problem of History in Husserl and Heidegger

On the Nonindependent Parts of Time-Consciousness: Husserl’s Early Phenomenological Investigations and the Perception of Melody

Towards a dialethic theory of time-consciousness

Time-consciousness in computational phenomenology: a temporal analysis of active inference

Husserl’s Model of Time-Consciousness, and the Phenomenology of Rhythm

Reassessing Lewin on the Promise of Husserl's Phenomenology of Time-Consciousness

Consciousness, Absolute Flow and Transcendental Phenomenology

Approaching the nature of consciousness through a phenomenal analysis of early vision. What is the explanandum?

Time and Existence --heidegger's Theory of Temporality on the Later Stage

Is the time's flow an illusion? — the issue of the temporality of the conscious experience

Sensation and Being Within the Horizons of Intuition of Essence--An Analysis of Husserl's Thinking of Intuition