Abstract:Vocal mimicry can develop either through imitation of heterospecific models (primary mimicry) or through imitation of conspecifics already producing mimetic song (secondary mimicry). Distinguishing primary versus secondary mimicry is important from ecological, evolutionary, and neurobiological perspectives. We outline four empirical strategies for researchers to detect the usage of secondary mimicry: (1) model selection strategy (heterospecific model commonly mimicked but rare or absent locally), (2) usage frequency strategy (syllable types commonly mimicked but rarely used by the model), (3) acoustic structure strategy (acoustic divergence in how a syllable type gets produced by mimics versus models), and (4) syntax strategy (consistent variation between mimic and model in the ordering of syllable types). We then use these strategies to produce evidence for secondary mimicry in northern mockingbirds ( Mimus polyglottos ), focusing mostly on the mimicked songs of northern cardinals ( Cardinalis cardinalis ) and tufted titmice ( Baeolophus bicolor ). As further evidence of the mechanisms by which secondary mimicry might occur, we also demonstrate that mockingbirds match countersing much more frequently in response to conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Deeper questions about the precise extent of primary versus secondary mimicry in mockingbirds and other mimicking species still need answers. Vocal mimicry can develop either through imitation of heterospecific models (primary mimicry) or through imitation of conspecifics already producing mimetic song (secondary mimicry). Distinguishing primary versus secondary mimicry is important from ecological, evolutionary, and neurobiological perspectives. We outline four empirical strategies for researchers to detect the usage of secondary mimicry: (1) model selection strategy (heterospecific model commonly mimicked but rare or absent locally), (2) usage frequency strategy (syllable types commonly mimicked but rarely used by the model), (3) acoustic structure strategy (acoustic divergence in how a syllable type gets produced by mimics versus models), and (4) syntax strategy (consistent variation between mimic and model in the ordering of syllable types). We then use these strategies to produce evidence for secondary mimicry in northern mockingbirds ( Mimus polyglottos ), focusing mostly on the mimicked songs of northern cardinals ( Cardinalis cardinalis ) and tufted titmice ( Baeolophus bicolor ). As further evidence of the mechanisms by which secondary mimicry might occur, we also demonstrate that mockingbirds match countersing much more frequently in response to conspecifics versus heterospecifics. Deeper questions about the precise extent of primary versus secondary mimicry in mockingbirds and other mimicking species still need answers.

Two Sympatric Species of Passerine Birds Imitate the Same Raptor Calls in Alarm Contexts

Crying wolf to a predator: deceptive vocal mimicry by a bird protecting young

Pair‐Coordinated Calling: Eurasian Magpies Respond Differently to Simulated Intruder Pairs That Overlap or Alternate Their Calls

Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls

On the sparrowhawk-like calls of female common cuckoos: testing for heterospecific vocal mimicry in a conspecific functional context

Strangers like me: birds respond equally to a familiar and an unfamiliar sentinel species' alarm calls, but respond less to non‐core and non‐sentinel's alarm calls

Chick-a-dee call variation in the context of “flying” avian predator stimuli: a field study of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis)

Discriminating between similar alarm calls of contrasting function

Learning mimetic cuckoo call innovations from neighbors in a Chinese songbird

Investigating flock-associated mimicry: examining the evidence for, and drivers of, plumage mimicry in the greater and lesser necklaced laughingthrush

Artoo-Detoo: What imitating a Star Wars droid reveals on allospecific vocal imitation in parrots and starlings

Variation in chick-a-dee call sequences, not in the fine structure of chick-a-dee calls, influences mobbing behaviour in mixed-species flocks

Do vocal mimics learn their mimetic songs from heterospecifics or conspecifics?

Vocal repertoire of Azure-winged Magpies (Cyanopica cyanus): A context-associated communication system

Vocal repertoire of Azure-winged Magpies<i> (Cyanopica</i><i> cyanus):</i> A context-associated communication system

Functional neurogenomic responses to acoustic threats, including a heterospecific referential alarm call and its referent, in the auditory forebrain of red-winged blackbirds

Vocal convergence and social proximity shape the calls of the most basal Passeriformes, New Zealand Wrens

Heterospecific eavesdropping on an anti-parasitic referential alarm call

Behavioral responses to predator and heterospecific alarm calls are habitat-specific in Eurasian tree sparrows

Alarm Calling in Plateau Pika (Ochotona curzoniae): Evidence from Field Observations and Simulated Predator and Playback Experiments

Geographic Variation in Note Types of Alarm Calls in Japanese Tits (Parus minor)