High-dose chemotherapy supported by peripheral hematopoietic stem cells in young metastatic breast cancer patients

SONG Guo-hong,REN Jun,DI Li-jun,YU Jing,JIA Jun,SHAO Bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2011.01.011
2011-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:Incidences of breast cancer occurring in younger people have been increasing gradually.The prognosis for these patients is very poor.It is difficult to achieve specific desired results,especially in younger metastatic breast cancer patients.Specific treatment measures are needed.High dose chemotherapy(HDC) supported by peripheral hematopoietic stem cells used on breast cancer is still controversial,although it may benefit some subgroups.This study explored the benefits of HDC for metastatic breast cancer in younger patients.Methods:Thirty metastatic breast cancer patients,≤40 years old,were enrolled in this study.Of all cases,16 received HDC and 14 received standard dose chemotherapy(SDC).For HDC group,peripheral CD34+ and hematopoietic stem cells were mobilized using chemotherapy docetaxel 120 mg/m2 and G-CSF;followed by 2 cycles of HDC were subsequently administered(15 cases with docetaxel 120 mg/m2+thiotepa 175 mg/m2+carboplatin AUC=6,1 case with docetaxel 120 mg/m2+thiotepa 175 mg/m2).For SDC group,docetaxel 75 mg/m2+thiotepa 50-60 mg/m2 were administered every 3 weeks for 4 to 6 cycles according to the progression of the disease.The primary objective of this study was to compare progression free survival(PFS) and overall survival(OS).Results:We observed 5(31.3%) vs 1(7.1%) with partial responses with HDC and SDC,respectively.Median PFS was 9 months(2.3-15.7 months) vs 3.8 months(2.7-4.9 months,P=0.044) for HDC and SDC,respectively.Overall survival was 11.8-21.2 months(median 18 months) vs 6.8-16.0 months(median 11.4 months,P=0.058) for HDC and SDC,respectively.The toxicities of HDC were tolerable.Conclusion:HDC supported by peripheral hematopoietic stem cells was an effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer in younger patients.This conclusion is worthy of future usage and further investigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?