Comparative environmental assessment of methanol production technologies: A cradle-to-gate life cycle analysis
Jing Liu,Jun Zhao,Haiqiao Wei,Qiang Zhu,Yang Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118128
IF: 10.4
2024-02-08
Energy Conversion and Management
Abstract:The surge in methanol demand as a fuel source, coupled with global resource competition, necessitates innovative routes for bulk chemical production, including methanol. China, a prominent methanol producer and consumer, drives industry expansion, raising substantial environmental concerns. This article compares the state-of-the-art "liquid sunlight" methanol production technology with traditional pathways through a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment. The research analyzed ten environmental impact categories and two endpoint categories. It revealed that the coal gasification to methanol has the most severe comprehensive environmental impact, which is 2.0–3.6 times that of the other four routes. For these five technological routes, 73% to 81% of the impact is on ecosystem damage, followed by 10% to 12% on human health damage. This research find that adopting 100% clean energy electricity can reduces of 79.6%, 64.4%, 81.4%, and 81.0% in cumulative impacts for coal gasification/coal coking/natural gas/biomass to methanol by sensitivity analysis and electricity optimization. In the CO 2 capture route, the potential reduction achieved 54.9% by electricity optimization, while the impact can be lowered by 85.2% when optimizing both steam and electricity. To ensure competitiveness, CO 2 capture to methanol route must be combined with clean electricity resources. In summary, modifying technology or optimizing clean electric power can advance the methanol industry towards sustainable goals.
energy & fuels,thermodynamics,mechanics