Diagnosis and treatment of various types of pancreatic cystic neoplasms
黄晨松,钟记华,陈伟,蔡建鹏,赖佳明,梁力建,殷晓煜
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20201109-00704
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of various types of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 244 PCNs patients who underwent surgical resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from January 2009 to December 2018 were collected. There were 70 males and 174 females, aged from 5 to 79 years, with a median age of 43 years. Patients received corresponding surgical methods according to the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative exploration. Observation indicators: (1) classification and clinicopathological features of PCNs; (2) preoperative CA19-9 levels of PCNs patients; (3) results of imaging examinations; (4) surgical situations; (5) postoperative complications. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Count data were represented as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. Results:(1) Classification and clinicopathological features of PCNs: in 244 PCNs patients, there were 76 cases of serous cystic neoplasm (SCN), 56 cases of mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), 96 cases of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN), and 16 cases of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Among the 76 SCN patients, there were 22 males and 54 females, aged (51±14)years, with a range from 22 to 78 years. Of 76 SCN patients, there were 32 cases with abdominal pain while 44 without abdominal pain before surgery, and there were 47 cases with tumor located in the body and tail of the pancreas while 29 cases with tumor located in the head and neck of the pancreas. The postoperative pathological examination of all 76 SCN patients were benign. Among the 56 MCN patients, there were 16 males and 40 females, aged (49±16)years, with a range from 20 to 79 years. Of 56 MCN patients, there were 34 cases with abdominal pain while 22 without abdominal pain before surgery, and there were 35 cases with tumor located in the body and tail of the pancreas while 21 cases with tumor located in the head and neck of the pancreas. Eleven of the 56 MCN patients were pathologically confirmed as malignant tumors after operation. Among the 96 SPN patients, there were 21 males and 75 females, aged (32±14)years, with a range from 5 to 68 years. Of 96 SPN patients, there were 42 cases with abdominal pain while 54 without abdominal pain before surgery, and there were 58 cases with tumor located in the body and tail of the pancreas while 38 cases with tumor located in the head and neck of the pancreas. One of the 96 SPN patients were pathologically confirmed as malignant tumors after operation. Among the 16 IPMN patients, there were 11 males and 5 females, aged (56±10)years, with a range from 41 to 76 years. Of 16 IPMN patients, there were 11 cases with abdominal pain while 5 without abdominal pain before surgery, and there were 4 cases with tumor located in the body and tail of the pancreas while 12 cases with tumor located in the head and neck of the pancreas. Six of the 16 IPMN patients were pathologically confirmed as malignant tumors after operation. (2) Preoperative CA19-9 levels of PCNs patients: of 76 SCN patients, there were 9 cases with elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels while 67 cases with normal preoperative CA19-9 levels. Of 56 MCN patients, there were 7 cases with elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels while 49 cases with normal preoperative CA19-9 levels. Of 96 SPN patients, there were 14 cases with elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels while 82 cases with normal preoperative CA19-9 levels. Of 16 IPMN patients, there were 4 cases with elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels while 12 cases with normal preoperative CA19-9 levels. Of 244 PCNs patients, there were 226 cases with benign PCNs and 18 cases with malignant PCNs. The cases with elevated preoperative CA19-9 levels in 226 benign PCNs patients and 18 malignant PCNs patients were 26 and 8, respectively, showing a significant difference ( χ2=15.084, P<0.05). (3) Results of imaging examinations: of 244 PCNs patients, 163 cases underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination, including 59 cases of SCN, 37 cases of MCN, 55 cases of SPN, and 12 cases of IPMN. Of 163 patients undergoing contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination, there were 82 cases who had the result of contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination consistent with the result postoperative pathological examination, and the diagnosis accuracy rate was 50.3% (82/163). The diagnosis accuracy rates of contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination for the SCN, MCN, SPN and IPMN patients were 67.8%(40/59), 54.1%(20/37), 32.7%(18/55) and 4/12, respectively. Of 244 PCNs patients, 198 cases underwent computed tomography (CT) examination, including 60 cases of SCN, 44 cases of MCN, 82 cases of SPN, and 12 cases of IPMN. Of 198 patients undergoing CT examination, there were 135 cases who had the result of CT examination consistent with the result postoperative pathological examination, and the diagnosis accuracy rate was 68.2%(135/198). The diagnosis accuracy rates of CT examination for the SCN, MCN, SPN and IPMN patients were 76.7%(46/60), 79.5%(35/44), 58.5%(48/82) and 6/12, respectively. (4) Surgical situations: 244 patients underwent surgery successfully according to the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative exploration, without death during operation. Of 76 SCN patients, there were 20 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 20 cases undergoing spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 14 cases undergoing distal pancreatectomy combined with splenectomy, 9 cases undergoing local tumor resection, 7 cases undergoing duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and 6 cases undergoing middle pancreatectomy, respectively. Of 56 MCN patients, there were 20 cases undergoing distal pancreatectomy combined with splenectomy, 16 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 9 cases undergoing spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 8 cases undergoing middle pancreatectomy and 3 cases undergoing local tumor resection, respectively. Of 96 SPN patients, there were 34 cases undergoing distal pancreatectomy combined with splenectomy, 23 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 15 cases undergoing spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 12 cases undergoing local tumor resection, 8 cases undergoing middle pancreatectomy, 3 cases undergoing duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and 1 case undergoing total pancreatectomy, respectively. Of 16 IPMN patients, there were 9 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 3 cases undergoing distal pancreatectomy combined with splenectomy, 3 cases undergoing total pancreatectomy and 1 case undergoing spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, respectively. (5) Postoperative complications: of 76 SCN patients, 17 cases had pancreatic fistula including 12 cases of biochemical fistula and 5 cases of grade B pancreatic fistula, 7 cases had abdominal infection, 1 case had delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy, 1 case had abdominal hemorrhage, 1 case had chyle fistula and 1 case had anastomotic fistula after middle pancreatectomy, respectively. Of 56 MCN patients, 7 cases had pancreatic fistula including 2 cases of biochemical fistula and 5 cases of grade B pancreatic fistula, 3 cases had abdominal infection, 2 cases had biliary fistula, 1 case had delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy, 1 case had gastrointestinal bleeding and 1 case had postoperative portal vein thrombosis, respectively. Of 96 SPN patients, 14 cases had pancreatic fistula including 5 cases of biochemical fistula, 8 cases of grade B pancreatic fistula, and 1 case of grade C pancreatic fistula, 6 cases had abdominal infection, 4 cases had delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy, 2 cases had abdominal hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding, 1 case had biliary fistula and 1 case had postoperative portal vein thrombosis, respectively. Of 16 IPMN patients, 3 cases had pancreatic fistula including 1 case of biochemical fistula, 1 case of grade B pancreatic fistula, and 1 case of grade C pancreatic fistula, 2 cases had abdominal hemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding, 1 case had abdominal infection, 1 case had biliary fistula and 1 case had pulmonary embolism, respectively. The patient with pulmonary embolism died during the perioperative period, and the other patients with postoperative complications were discharged after conservative treatment, percutaneous drainage, interventional therapy or secondary surgery, respectively. Conclusions:Patients with various types of PCNs including SCN, MCN, SPN and IPMN lack specific clinical symptoms and results of laboratory test. The CA19-9 levels has no significance for the classification of PCNs, but can be considered as a reference for distinguishing benign and malignant PCNs preoperatively. Imaging examination is the main diagnostic basis of PCNs. Surgical indications should be strictly controlled in patients with PCNs, and surgery should be actively performed in patients with indicators.