Clinical Character and Treatment Evaluation with Olfactory Neuroblastoma and Olfactory Esthesioneoroepithelioma

WANG Wei-fang,YUAN Wei,WANG Sheng-zi,WANG Shu-yi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3639.2006.06.017
2006-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:With the improvement of electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry,the reports on olfactory neuroblastoma and olfactory esthesioneoroepithelioma have increased.We evaluated the clinical character and the therapeutic outcome in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma and olfactory esthesioneoroepithelioma,and discussed treatment options for this kind of disease.Methods:Olfactory neuroblastoma and olfactory esthesioneoroepithelioma are the same disease clinically.19 patients with biopsy-proven olfactory neuroblastoma and 10 patients with biopsy-proven olfactory esthesioneoroepithelioma were reviewed altogether.10 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone,15 with surgery and preoperative radiotherapy,and 4 with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.According to the Kadish's staging,there were 3 Stage A,8 Stage B,18 Stage C.The survival analysis was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier Method and Log rank test.Results:26 patients(89.66%) have unilateral nasal obstruction or unilateral epistaxis or both.Cervical lymph node metastases were found at presentation in 5 patients(17.24%).The 5-year survival rate,5-year disease-free survival rate were 70.76%,(66.48%) respectively.The comparison of 5-year survival rate,5-year disease-free survival rate of olfactory neuroblastoma and olfactory esthesioneoroepithelioma had no significance statistically.The 5-year survival rates of Kadish's Stage A/B,C were 100.00%,54.32% respectively.The 4-year survival rates for patients with cervical lymph node metastases(N_(+))and without cervical lymph node metastases(N_(0))were 60.00%,71.05% respectively(P0.05).Conclusions:Lymph node metastases is a poor prognostic factor.With the use of endoscopic surgery,radiotherapy has been a major option for olfactory neuroblastoma(olfactory esthesioneoroepithelioma).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?