1452 TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHTOMY 800 CASES: A 10-YEAR SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Gonghui Li,Damin Yu,Xinde Li,Xuefang Rui,Guoqing Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1166
2010-01-01
Abstract:You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: SWL, Ureteroscopic or Percutaneous Stone Removal I1 Apr 20101452 TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC URETEROLITHTOMY 800 CASES: A 10-YEAR SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE Gonghui Li, Damin Yu, Xinde Li, Xuefang Rui, and Guoqing Ding Gonghui LiGonghui Li More articles by this author , Damin YuDamin Yu More articles by this author , Xinde LiXinde Li More articles by this author , Xuefang RuiXuefang Rui More articles by this author , and Guoqing DingGuoqing Ding More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1166AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES we report our 10-year experience in performing transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithtomy on 800 patients to determine its indication,safety and effectacy and advantages in the current era of minimally invasive surgery. METHODS We performed 800 transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy during the past 10 years. Main indication was large (1.5 to 3.5 cm), impacted stone. Other indications were failed ESWL and a failed attempt at ureteroscopy. RESULTS There were no major complications. The stone was successfully removed in all 800 patients, 9 patients.needed the combination of flexible cystscopy. The operative time ranged from 32 to 185 minutes (mean 65). No intra-operative complication was encountered and no patient required a blood transfusion. Average duration of hospi-tal stay was 2-4 days. During follow-up 3 months later IVU revealed normal ureter in all cases. CONCLUSIONS In selected patients with large, hard, impacted ureteral stones, laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a reason-able treatment option. It is a minimally invasive and maximally effective procedure and is an economically viable option where laparoscopic instruments are easily available. We recommend laparoscopy for large ureteral stone (1.5 cm and above). Hangzhou, People's Republic of China© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e559-e560 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Gonghui Li More articles by this author Damin Yu More articles by this author Xinde Li More articles by this author Xuefang Rui More articles by this author Guoqing Ding More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...