Clinical Assessment of FAB and WHO Classification of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

FENG Ru,CHANG Naibai,ZHU Ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2806.2006.04.003
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The comparison between the clinical practicability of the FAB classification and the WHO classification of Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) was analyzed and assessed. Method: Patients with MDS were classified according to the FAB subtypes and the WHO subtypes. Retrospective analysis was made on each patient 's data of morphological, clinical, laboratory examination and prognosis. Result; Hematopoietic dysplasia was observed in both of MDS and AML. According to the FAB cooperative group criteria, differences of the survival rates among RA, RAEB, RAEB-T and AML were significant. According to WHO group criteria, significant differences were observed between the survival rates of RA and RAEB, and between RCMD and RAEB, but not between RA and RCMD. Significant difference was also observed between the survival rates of RAEB -Ⅰand RAEB-Ⅱ. Conclusion:There is no advantage in the splitting RA of FAB into RA and RCMD in the WHO classification. Compared to AML, RAEB-T had shorter survival time, So defining RAEB-T as AML according to WHO working group criteria is useful in terms of clinical treatment. Based on the percentage of blast cells, division of RAEB into RAEB-Ⅰand RAEB-Ⅱis better for clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?