Determining Effect of the Land Consolidation Project on Cropland Ecosystem Based on Ecological Flow Method
GUO Beibei,JIN Xiaobin,LIN Yinan,YANG Xuhong,ZHOU Yinkang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201405110964
2015-01-01
Acta Ecologica Sinica
Abstract:Ecological flows reflect the relationships among metabolism, energy conversion, information exchange, and so forth. A quantitative analysis of the development of ecological flow patterns of various parameters was performed. Based on existing exergy accounting, ecological flow networks in a typical semi-natural cropland ecosystem were analyzed, with five ecological indicators being used to evaluate the ecological effectiveness of these networks. Exergy buffers the capacity and environmental impact on cropland ecosystems. Previous studies have examined exergy effectiveness in a variety of fields, but exergy analysis has rarely been applied to assess cropland ecosystems. Research time is significant because ecosystem stability varies in different periods;hence, ecological flow results will differ. In the cropland ecosystem used for this study, we chose the time period from planting to harvest to determine eco-flows based on the life-cycle theory, and set the land consolidation project edge as the boundary. This study only considered crop growth and the impacts of human-assisted primary production. As a sudden short-term external incentive of the project cropland ecosystem area, land consolidation activities influenced ecological flow changes after land consolidation project implementation ( LCPI ) , which included material, energy, and information flow changes. A land consolidation ecological conceptual model was built and reflected ecological flow direction and path. It used exergy and emergy accounting methods to study the external input, output, and ecological products. The study used a land consolidation project in Fengxiang County of Shaanxi Province as a case study, and applied ecological flow analysis to it to determine the intensity of ecological flow and system efficiency. Using different land consolidation project terms, this study evaluated net ecological value, natural resource dependency, renewability dependency, ecosystem productivity, ecological capacity, and ecological sustainability after LCPI. The exergy and emergy accounting methods presentedchanges to the ecological benefits process as a steep negative decline at the preliminary stage, followed by an exponential increase, and finally leveled off. Second, the exergy accounting method traced the ecological benefit losses and profit over the 29 years after LCPI in the study area was initiated, and manifested the system process recovery from chaos to natural balance. Third, the emergy accounting method demonstrated that, in the fourth year after LCPI, the ecosystem tended toward a state of relative balance, with an increase in ecological productivity and potential investment demands. Fourth, the economic benefits of the land consolidation project were negative and leveled off after 3 years, reflecting an annual agricultural production investment of 78.35%. Through the combination of exergy and emergy, the system stability was quantified and calculated. This study can be used as a reference for deciding input material, labor, capital, etc. for use in future land consolidation project planning.