Cryopreservation of swine small intestine in new-type organ preservation: compared with UW solution

GUO Ming-xiao,LI You-sheng,WANG Zhi-liang,LI Jie-shou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2013.01.002
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the cryopreservation effect of Lifor organ preservation solution in preserving swine small intestine. Methods A total of 24 swines were randomly divided into two groups: Lifor group and University of Wisconsin(UW) group, of which small intestines were respectively lavaged and preserved in Lifor solution and UW solution in 4 ℃. Each group was further divided into preserved 6 h subgroup and 9 h subgroup according to the preserving time of small intestines. The models of segmental small intestine autologous transplantation of swines were created. The changes of pathology and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) of intestinal mucosa were compared between Lifor group and UW group.And then, maltose absorption was evaluated as a functional test of small intestine graft absorption (maltose was perfused by transplant small intestine stomas, and serum glucose levels were measured at different time). Results After 6 h and 9 h cryopreservation, there was no significant difference in pathological changes between two groups(all in P>0.05). The damage of small intestine mucosa of 9 h subgroup was more severe than that of 6 h subgroup. After 6 h and 9 h cryopreservation, there was no significant difference in content of ATP between two groups(all in P>0.05). The content of ATP in small intestine mucosa was gradually decreased along with the preserving time. There was no significant difference in intestinal absorptive function between two groups at 7 d and 14 d after transplantation (all in P>0.05). Conclusions The cryopreservation effect of Lifor solution is similar to UW solution but less cost. It may be developed as a new cryopreservation solution for clinical application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?