Effect of Dietary Small Peptides on Growth and Non-Specific Immunity of Penaeus Vannamei Larvae

LIN Qi-cun,FANG Chang-fu,ZHONG Guo-fang,FENG Yan,ZHU Bi-ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2010.05.009
2010-01-01
Abstract:The present study was conducted to determine the effect of small peptides on growth performance and non-specific immune of Penaeus vannamei.Four isonitrogenous and isoenergetic experimental diets were formulated.Diet containing no small peptides served as the control diet.The other three trial diets was added 1%,2%,3% small peptides respectively.After 60 d-feeding,growth rate,serum antibacterial activity,lysozyme activity and phenol oxidase(PO) activity were measured,a challenge test was conducted with Vibrio harveyi.The results showed that there was significant difference in length gain,weight gain,feed coefficient and survival rate(P0.05) of Penaeus vannamei among the control group and the treatments.The length gain of 1%,2% and 3% trial group was 17.74%,27.75% and 17.46% higher than that of the control,respectively.The weight gain of shrimp was 12.15%,31.16% and 19.01% higher than that of the control,respectively.The feed coefficient was 21.57%,33.99% and 25.49% lower than that of the control,respectively.The survival rate was 12.23%,18.89% and 8.89% higher than that of the control,respectively.Small peptides significantly enhanced(P0.05)non-specific immune activity of Penaeus vannamei.The antibacterial activity of 1%,2% and 3% trial group were 21.05%,42.10% and 10.53% higher than that of the control,respectively.The lysozyme activity were 16.54%,24.56% and 15.54%,PO activity were 25.70%,41.90% and 24.02% higher than that of the control,respectively.The results of Vibrio harveyi challenge showed that cumulative mortality of the control in the five days was 96.7% and higher than that of the trial groups.It was concluded that the upper limit of small peptides for optimal growth performance and non-specific immune function in Penaeus vannamei feed was about 2%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?