Efficacy of Second Stage Resection following Transcatheter Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Hardly Radical Excision

Wu-sheng YU,Rong-ping GUO,Ming SHI,Chong ZHONG,Wei WEI,Ya-qi ZHANG,Jin-qing LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1672-3554.2007.06.026
2007-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To investigate the significance and efficacy of second stage resection following transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of hardly radical excision.[Methods]The 143 enrolled large HCC patients were retrospectively divided into group A (preoperative TACE group, 68 cases) and group B (non-TACE group, 75 cases). The operative outcome, complications, tumor-residual rate, and survival rate were compared between the two groups. [Results] ①The rates of encapsulation and liver adhesions were significantly more in group A than in group B. There were fewer tumor-residual and more frequent necrosis in group A (P< 0.05). ②The average time of clamping porta hepatis, blood loss, and postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. ③The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates and tumor-freely survival rates were 88.2%, 53.0%, 36.1% and 65.7%, 37.7%, 30.4% in group A, 68.8%, 36.9%, 25.1% and 46.2%, 24.4%, 9.7% in group B, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (P< 0.05).[Conclusions] TACE could diminish tumor, advance encapsulation and reduce tumor-residual. The preoperative TACE increases obviously the radical resection rate and improves the actual survival time in the patients with large HCC of hardly radical excision.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?