Using Media-Mechanism Shifts To Uncover Design Communication Needs
stephen a r scrivener,c d chen,ashley woodcock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0779-8_33
2000-01-01
Abstract:In early work, Tang (1989) and Bly (1988) determined the requirements for remote design support systems by studying collaborative design in face-to-face settings, focussing on communication with drawings and gesture. Later studies addressed other design communicative materials, such as objects (Harrison and Minneman, 1996), physical and CAD models, and the changing studio environment itself (Minneman and Harrison, 1997). These researchers regarded the communicative media and behaviour of face-to-face working as necessary to effective design communication. Yet, studies comparing face-to-face and multimedia collaboration environments failed to show significant effects due to impoverished communication or, at best, contradictory results (cf., Whittaker, 1997), suggesting that the media and behaviour of face-to-face working are not necessary conditions for successful computer mediated collaborative distal design. Indeed, Kvan et al. (1997) postulate that social and situational factors have little effect on shaping the measurable outcomes of collaborative design. Designers adapt to or adapt a communication environment to overcome social and situational impoverishment. Earlier, when summarising the learning from a number of distal collaborative design studies, Scrivener and Clark (1994) concluded that motivated designers exploit the resources at their disposal to complete a task, even when this involves radical changes in work and communication methods. Hollan and Stornetta (1992) also argue against face-to-face, or ‘being there’, as a model for designing telecommunications.