Comparison of the effectiveness between hinged external fixator and castfixation in treating acute complex instability of elbow

Zhao Yan,Yin Yi,Huang Fuguo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1439.2009.04.010
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare hinged external fixator combining with internal fixation and cast fixation after routine surgery in treatment of acute complex instability of elbow.Methods From January 2004 to June 2006,103 cases of unstable elbow fracture dislocation were treated respectively by unilateral hinged external fixator and cast fixation,and 80 of them were followed up.There were 44 males and 36 females with the average age of 33.7 years(17-65 years).They were divided into fixator group(n =38)and cast group(n =42)The 80 elbow fracture dislocation involved 31 on left side,47 on right side and 2 bilaterally.All the 80 cases were evaluated with JOA assessment score.Results The average follow-up time was 15.6 months(12-18 months).The mean time of fixation with fixator was 7.5 weeks(6-8 weeks).The mean time of fracture healing was 7.5 weeks in cast group and 8 weeks in fixator group.Both function and arc of motion in cast group and fixator group showed significant difference(15.51±1.50 vs 18.51±1.40,P<0.01;13.40±7.79 vs 18.54±8.62,P<0.01),While the pain,articular instability and deformity showed no statistical difference.The total assessment score between 2 groups indicated marked difference(73.44±10.21 vs 81.63±10.75,P<0.01).Conclusion Hinged external fixator can enhance lateral stability of elbows,benefit the reduction of fracture dislocation,guarantee early safe functional exercise,prevent from elbow stiffness,and reduce heterotopic ossification.In treating acute complex instability of elbow,the hinged external fixator is superior to other therapy with respect of improving the function of elbow joint.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?