Analysis of coronary stenting treatment after thrombolys is in AMI

闫忠政,吴天兵,全劲松,苑丽丽,吴波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2009.22.001
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate coronary lesion trait and curative effect of stenting treatment on re-emerging mycardial ischemia after thrombolysis in acute myocardia infarction.Methods:182 cases of thrombolysis in AMI patients who had re-emerging myocardial is chemia under sentiny trentment after AMI.They were divided into intravenous thrombolytic patency group (group A),non-patency group(group B) follow-up nas 6 ~ 18 months.Left ventricnlar ejection fraction(LVEF) was measured by ultrasonic cardiogram(uug).Before and after follow-up.The degree of IRA or non-IRA and the degree of TIMI.Were reasured before follow-up.Results:Both group A and group B had a large proportion of IRA seriou residual stenosis,before stenting treatment,and degree of stenosis was higher in group B than in groupA,and degree of TIMI was lower in group B (P < 0.01).The cases(97.4%) were successfully senting and successful rate of senting and occuring rate of serious non-IRA stenosis hadn' t significant dif- ference(P > 0.05).161 cases(91%) were follow-up in 6 ~ 18 months and there was on death.The occuring rate of cardiovacuiar incident was loweriy in group A than in group B(P < 0.05) LVEF in group A was higher at the end of follow-up than before follow-up and in group B(P < 0.01).Conclusion: There are alarge proportion of IRA and some non-IRA serious residual stenosis afeor thrombolysis in AMI.So it is necessary,saftey and highy successful rate to sent to serious stenosis IRA and non-IRA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?