Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Development of Emotional Intelligence Scale for Pupils

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

Validation of Emotional Intelligence Scale in Chinese University Students

Development and validation of the Emotional Intelligence Test for Adolescents in a Chinese sample.

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance Across Sex of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in Chinese adolescents

Development and validation of the Emotional Awareness Questionnaire for Teachers in China

Psychological Health Diathesis Assessment System:The Establishment of Chinese Adult Emotionality Scale

Reliability and Validity of Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in Middle School Students

A multilevel analysis on the evaluation and promotion of emotional intelligence among Chinese school adolescents

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Physical Education in University Students.

Th e Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Emotion ality Scale among Civil Servants

Emotional Intelligence: Construct Validity and Instrumentality

Constructing and Analyzing the Levels of Emotional Intelligence Factors of International Chinese Language Teachers: An Analysis of SPSS Data Based on a Sample of 200 Teachers

The development and validation of the Emotional Cultivation Scale: An East Asian cultural perspective.

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Development of Social-Emotional Competence Scale for Young Children

Assessing the Emotional Intelligence Level of School Heads towards Crafting an Executive Development Program

Development of Chinese college students' perception teacher differential behavior scale and its reliability and validity test

School-Based Training for Sustainable Emotional Development in Chinese Preschoolers: A Quasi-Experiment Study

Chinese Version of Courtauld Emotional Control Scale:Reliability and Validity