Differentiation of Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis with Helical CT

WANG Hao,WEI Ran,WANG Lan-yun,ZHANG Bei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9011.2012.01.035
2012-01-01
Journal of Medical Imaging
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the value of computed tomography(CT) in differential diagnosing perforated appendicitis from nonperforated.Methods:Findings from imaging examinations in 151 patients with pathologically confirmed acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed.Patients were classified into two groups based on surgical and pathological results: perforated group(66 cases) and nonperforated group(85 cases).Two radiologists evaluated appendiceal location,appendix diameter,intraluminal and extraluminal appendicolith,intraluminal and extraluminal air,abscess and focal defect in enhancing appendiceal wall.The presence of pelvic inflammation,periappendicitis and enlarged lymph nodes were also evaluated.The CT imaging findings were compared between perforated and nonperforated appendicitis.Results:Perforated appendicitis showed typical features in CT imaging: extraluminal appendicolith,extraluminal air,abscess and focal defect in enhancing appendiceal wall,which were found to be significantly different between perforated and nonperforated group(P0.05 for each finding).Periappendicitis and pelvic inflammation were found more frequently in perforated group(P0.05 for each finding).The appendix diameters had statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05).There were no statistically significant difference in other CT findings between the two groups,including appendiceal location,intraluminal appendicolith,intraluminal air,and enlarged lymph nodes(P0.05 for each finding).Conclusion:CT is a effective and valuable examination in the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.Extraluminal appendicolith,extraluminal air,abscess and focal defect in enhancing appendiceal wall were specific features in CT imaging for diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.Periappendicitis,pelvic inflammation and appendiceal diameter had certain significance in differentiating perforated appendicitis from nonperforated one.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?