Abstract:AIM: To compare the curative effect of radiofrequency and anterior discectomy and posterior lumbar fixation on discogenic low back pain. METHODS: ①Fifty-three patients with low back pain and complete clinical data including 33 males and 20 females aged 33-58 years were selected from Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, and Department of Orthopaedics, the Third Hospital of Peking University between January 1999 and August 2005. Those without obvious root compression, unstable lumbar vertebrae or other lumbar diseases, and accorded with the positive standards of discography complicated by the International Pain Association in 1988 were included. All the patients were informed and agreed to the treatment. ②The patients were divided into three groups according to different treatments: radiofrequency group (n =21) was given percutaneous puncture radiofrequency vapourization plasty; anterior lumbar interbody fusion group (n =14) was treated with extralperitoneal removal of vertebral disc, Cage implanting combined posterior lumbar fixation with translaminar facet screws and iliac bone graft; posterior lumbar interbody fusion group (n =18) was treated with posterior removal of vertebral disc, Cage implanting combined internal fixation of lumbar spondylolisthesis by pedicle screws and laminar fusion. ③The operation time and blood loss were recorded and radiology was performed to evaluate fusion condition at one year after operation. The pain degree was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS, painless scored 0, and the maximal degree unbearable pain scored 10). Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was adopted to evaluate the functional improvement (higher scores represented severer functional limitation). All the evaluations were carried out before and 1 year after operation. Improvement rate=[(preoperative score-postoperative score)/preoperative score]×100%. Grading standards were as follows: excellent: improvement ≥ 75%; very good with 50%-75% improvement; good with 25%-50% improvement; bad with < 25% improvement. ④Comparison of measurement data was performed with analysis of variance with successive repetitive data measurement. RESULTS: All 53 patients were involved in the result analysis. ①Comparison of operation duration and blood loss: The operation duration and blood loss of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group were longer and more than the other groups (P < 0.05); the radiofrequency group was shorter and less than the anterior lumbar interbody fusion group (P < 0.05). ②Pain improvement after operation: In the radiofrequency group, there were 9 cases with excellent grade, 10 with good and 2 with bad; the pain scores of the anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusion groups were excellent. The improvement rate of VAS score of the radiofrequency group was significantly lower than the other two groups (P < 0.05). ③Functional improvement after operation: In the radiofrequency group, there were 5 cases with very good grade, 13 with good and 3 with bad; there were 12 cases with excellent grade and 2 with very good in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion group; in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group, there were 6 cases with excellent grade, and 12 with very good grade. The ODI functional improvement rate of the radiofrequency group was markedly lower than the other two groups (P < 0.05), and the anterior lumbar interbody fusion group was remarkably higher than the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group (P < 0.05). ④Vertebral fusion: The fusion rates of the two fusion groups were 100% after 1 year of operation. CONCLUSION: Radiofreqency has less wound but bad curative effect. The anterior discectomy with translaminar facet screws and posterior discectomy with pedicle screw fixation could effectively relieve the pain; moreover, the former method has a better functional improvement with less wound and is the best choice for the treatment of discogenic low back pain.

Clinical characteristics and treatment of discogenic low back pain

Relationship of Endplate Changes and Low Back Pain after Discectomy

Advance in Minimally Invasive Therapy of Internal Disc Disruption

The Change of Shape and Curvature in Degenerative Lumbar Disc and Its Clinical Significance

Progresses of minimally invasive interventional therapy in discogenic low back pain

[Application of Lumbar Discography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of the Discogenic Lumbodynias].

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Intradiscal Steroid Injection in Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain Combined with Radial Fissure of Annulus Fibrosis

The analysis of diagnosis and treatment in four patients with pain in lower extremities and low back caused by non-disc herniation

Effect of radiofrequency versus anterior discectomy and posterior lumbar fixation on discogenic low back pain

Discogenic Low Back Pain Treaded with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Vertebral Pedicle Screw Fixation

The value of CT-guided discography in the diagnoses of discogenic low back pain

Clinical study of the diagnosis of thoracolumbar disc herniations

A Retrospective Study of Surgery and Non Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

The Mid-Term Follow-Up Results of Artificial Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain

Clinical study of percutaneous coablation nucleoplasty for the treatment of discogenic low back pain

The distribution of Modic changes of lumbar endplate in patients suffering low back pain or radiculopathy and its related factors

Clinical Value of One-Level Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases

Quantitative MRI analysis of the surface area, signal intensity and MRI index of the central bright area for the evaluation of early adjacent disc degeneration after lumbar fusion

Regression of a large prolapsed lumbar disc herniation achieved by conservative treatment: A case report and literature review

Analysis of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation after Discectomies:A Report of 32 Patients

Anatomic and Pathophysiologic Characterization, Clinical Evaluation, Biomarkers, AI, and Treatment Options