A Clinical Analysis of Sphincter-saving Resection for Senile Patients with Middle or Low Rectal Carcinoma

杜卫东,沈达明,黄春锦,唐健雄,袁祖荣
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-170x.2005.06.005
IF: 4.501
2005-01-01
Journal of Oncology
Abstract:[Purpose] To investigate the characteristics and effects of sphincter-saving resection(SSR)in patients with middle or low rectal carcinoma.[Methods] From Jan.1990 to Jul.1997,148 senile patients(60 years old)with middle or low rectal carcinoma underwent radical operation:sphincter-saving resection(senile SSR group,92 cases)and abdomino-perineal resection(senile APR group,56 cases).Meanwhile 86 young patients(60 years old)underwent sphincter-saving resection(young SSR group).The biological characteristics,complications,anal defecation function,local recurrence,distal metastasis and survival rates of 1-,3-and 5-year were analyzed.[Result]The moderate and high differentiated adenocarcinoma cases were more common in senile SSR group than in young SSR group(P0.05).The complication rate in senile SSR group(32.6%)was a little higher than that in young SSR group(29.1%,P0.05).The rates of local recurrence and distal metastasis in senile group(13.2%,26.3%)were lower than those in young SSR group(P0.05),and the survival rates of 1-,3-and 5-year in senile SSR group(97.4%,84.2%,65.8%)were significantly higher than those in young SSR group(P0.05).[Conclusion] Senile patients with middle or low rectal carcinoma are suitable for SSR because of its biological and physiological characteristics.The rate of local recurrence and distal metastasis is lower in senile SSR group than that in young SSR group,and the survival rate is higher than that in young SSR group.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?