Abstract:There are distinct Eastern and Western approaches that shape the conservation and interpretation of cultural heritage landscapes. While existing literature assesses each approach individually, there is limited research exploring potential for cross-cultural exchange and innovation to inform a more holistic conservation of heritage landscape sites. Using Chinese (representative of Eastern) and English (representative of Western) approaches as archetypal cases, and underpinned by a phenomenological ontological perspective, this theoretical contribution firstly establishes key distinctions between Chinese and English approaches toward heritage landscapes by conducting a review of relevant sources. Differences are subsequently synthesized into a comprehensive framework that supports a cultural convergence of approaches toward heritage landscapes. Informed by the literature, six key differences in approach are identified: (i) Philosophical underpinnings; (ii) spiritual and artistic emphasis; (iii) holistic and individual attitudes; (iv) concerns of continuity and evolution; (v) approaches toward community involvement; and (vi) relationship between nature, spirituality, and human-centricity. After reviewing these differences, a holistic framework is proposed that is underpinned by four key elements which have the capacity to overcome the differences identified: (i) harmonizing spirituality and esthetics; (ii) balancing continuity and evolution; (iii) fostering inclusive stewardship between communities and practitioners; and (iv) cultivating equilibrium between people and nature. The study concludes that this framework – what is termed a “cultural convergence” – can support more effective conservation of landscape sites, by capturing a broader cultural spectrum of heritage principles and concerns. The proposed framework opens avenues for cross-cultural exchange and advancement of more holistic heritage conservation strategies within an increasingly globalized heritage context. Future research should seek to apply this framework to the contemporary conservation of distinct heritage case study sites of interest to further advance research on this topic.

Reflections on Sino-Western Heritage Differences from Different Cultural Backgrounds——Based on Willem Derde’s Heritage and Its Cultural Boundaries

Deciphering Western-centrism with the Values of a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind:Inspiration of Heritage Politics Research on Chinese Practice

ON THE CONCEPT OF HERITAGE AND THE SYSTEM OF HERITAGE CONSERVATION IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD AND CHINA

China Faces the Challenge of World Heritage Concept:Thoughts after the 28th World Heritage Convention

Searching China's Cultural Orientation in the Contemporary Internation a Organizations

Authenticity and Integrity: Questioning and Rethinking

On the Differences Between Chinese and Western Cultures From the Perspective of Cultural Dimension Theory

A Summary of Heritage Authenticity and Integrity Studies at Home and Abroad

The reproduction of heritage in a Chinese village: whose heritage, whose pasts?

Reflections on the Present World of Chinese Traditional Culture from the Perspective of Comparison between Chinese and Western Philosophy

Heritage Tourism and Cultural Identity in China: Challenges and Opportunities for Development

Cultural convergence in heritage landscape conservation: A comparative study of Chinese and English traditions

Heritage Values and Its Conservation

Imbalance of Cultural Ecology and Construction of Cultural Ecology

Chinese Perceptions of Overseas Cultural Heritage: Emotive Existential Authenticity, Exoticism and Experiential Tourism

The European Perspective on China: A Historical Retrospection

Heritage studies and the privileging of theory

Ethical Intercultural Communication between the Western World and China

Reflections on The Relationship Between Western Contemporary Literary Theories and Chinese Literary Theory

Constructing Contemporary Chinese Learning in the Spirit of Chinese Culture

Which tradition is mine? Chinese women artists and cultural identity