Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of flapless and mini-flap surgeries on crestal bone changes around implants by using a canine mandible model.METHODS Bilateral,edentulated,flat alveolar ridges were created in the mandible of 12 mongrel dogs.After three months of healing,two implants were placed on each side of the mandible by flapless or mini-flap procedures.After a healing period of three months,six dogs were sacrificed to evaluate crestal bone changes after stage Ⅰ surgery.In the other six dogs,a second stage surgery and transmucosal abutment attachment were performed for mini-flap implants.After a healing period of two months,the remaining dogs were sacrificed to evaluate crestal bone changes after stageⅡ surgery.RESULTS When the mean peri-implant bone levels for flapless and mini-flap implants from stage Ⅰ to stageⅡ surgeries were compared,the mini-flap implants had a significantly greater height than the flapless implants(P0.05);however,after stageⅡ surgery,both flapless and mini-flap implants had comparable bone levels(P0.05).CONCLUSION Although there are no differences between flapless and mini-flap surgeries with respect to the overall amount of peri-implant bone loss,mini-flap surgery is more effective than flapless surgery in improving implant anchorage in the early phase after implant placement.

Bone Healing Around Implants Following Flapless and Mini-Flap Surgeries in Dogs