Sex Determines Neurofunctional Predictors of Language Learning Proficiency
C Chen,Gui Xue,Qi Dong,Zhen Jin,Tingyu LI,Fei Xue,Haiqiong Zhao,Ying Guo
IF: 3.054
2007-01-01
Neuropsychologia
Abstract:Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 741–747 Sex determines the neurofunctional predictors of visual word learning Chuansheng Chen a,∗ , Gui Xue b , Qi Dong c,∗∗ , Zhen Jin d , Tian Li c , Feng Xue c , Libo Zhao c , Yi Guo c a Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-7085, USA FPR-UCLA Center for Culture, Brain and Development, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA c State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, PR China d MRI Center, Beijing 306 Hospital, Beijing, PR China b Received 31 March 2006; received in revised form 10 August 2006; accepted 12 August 2006 Available online 25 September 2006 Abstract This study used functional MRI and an artificial language training paradigm to explore sex differences in the processing of a new writing system and how sex determines the optimal neural resource recruitment for visual word learning. Results indicated that males and females achieved equal learning outcome, and their learning curve followed a similar power function. They also showed similar overall activation in the fusiform cortex, a region that has been associated with visual word processing. Despite the absence of sex differences in averaged behavioral performance and neural activation, males and females were found to have different neural predictors of visual word learning. As predicted, left-lateralized fusiform activation predicted visual word learning for males, but not for females, whereas bilateral fusiform activation predicted visual word learning for females, but not males. These results suggest that male and female brains operate differently to achieve the best performance in visual word learning. The individual-differences approach adopted in the present study provides a new and useful perspective to sex differences. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Asymmetry; fMRI; Visual word learning; Individual differences; Sex differences Sex differences in the neural representation of language are an important issue in cognitive neuroscience. It has long been hypothesized that language is more strongly lateralized for males than for females. For example, it has been found that early brain damage in the left-hemisphere impairs only males’ but not females’ reading ability (e.g., Frith & Vargha-Khadem, 2001). Some neuroimaging studies have shown that males show more left-lateralized activation whereas females show more bilateral activation in language tasks (Kansaku, Yamaura, & Kitazawa, 2000; McGlone, 1980; Shaywitz et al., 1995), although oth- ers did not find such differences (Frost et al., 1999; Sommer, Aleman, Bouma, & Kahn, 2004). These results suggest that dif- ferent neural resources may be optimal for males and females to process native languages. But less is known about the sex differences in the neural substrates underlying the learning of a new language. Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 949 824 4184; fax: +1 949 824 3002. Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: cschen@uci.edu (C. Chen), dongqi@bnu.edu.cn (Q. Dong). 0028-3932/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.018 In addition to the group differences between the two sexes, there are pronounced individual variations within each sex (Tzourio-Mazoyer, Josse, Crivello, & Mazoyer, 2004; Xiong, Rao, Gao, Woldorff, & Fox, 1998), particularly when process- ing a nonfluent or new language (Dehaene et al., 1997; Xue, Chen, Jin, & Dong, 2006a). For example, in a passive-viewing task, Xue et al. (2006a) found that, despite the consistent leftward fusiform activation in the processing of subjects’ native language (i.e., Chinese), there was significant variance in fusiform asym- metry (from strong right-dominance to strong left-dominance) in the processing of visually matched, novel characters (i.e., Korean Hangul). This finding suggests that not all subjects show left-hemisphere dominance when processing visual words in a new language. Xue et al. further found that individuals who showed more left-lateralized fusiform activation were able to learn the new script or writing system more efficiently than those who showed more right-lateralized fusiform activation. These results suggested that some neural networks might be optimal for learning a new script and individuals may vary in their reliance on such a network. Considering the dominant left- ward fusiform activation in the processing of native language