0131 Sleep Deprivation Alters Two Physiological Systems' Responses to Repeated Stressors Differentially
Kirsie Lundholm,Sara Delane,Stephen James,Kimberly Honn,Devon Hansen,Hans Van Dongen,Brieann Satterfield
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsad077.0131
IF: 6.313
2023-05-01
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axes activate in response to stressors. Real-world exposure to stressors often co-occurs with total sleep deprivation (TSD). The SAM response to a single stressor appears unchanged by TSD, but salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) has shown that TSD blunts the SAM response to repeated stressor exposure. Using salivary cortisol concentration (SCC), we investigated the HPA response to repeated stressors under well-rested and TSD conditions. Methods N=10 healthy adults (ages 28.3±5.78; 5f) completed a 4-day/3-night in-laboratory study with 38h TSD preceded and followed by 10h sleep opportunities. On day 2 (well-rested) and day 3 (TSD), participants completed two stressor sessions in a high-fidelity shooting simulator, separated by 30min. Acting as police officers, civilian participants verbally interacted with emergency response scenarios and decided whether to use (simulated) deadly force. Seven saliva samples were collected each day: pre-stressor, and 0min, 15min, and 30min after each session. Samples were assayed for SCC and normalized against each day’s pre-stressor sample. Results Mixed-effects ANOVA showed a significant effect of sample time (F[5,99]=19.85, p< 0.001), with SCC peaking 15min after the first stressor session and steadily declining thereafter. The SCC peak was significantly blunted during TSD compared to well-rested (t[99]=2.84, p=0.006). Correlations with previously reported, simultaneously assessed sAA concentrations, which peaked right after the first stressor session, were not significant (p>0.2). Additionally, whereas sAA showed a second peak after the second stressor session when participants were well-rested, no second peak was found in SCC. Conclusion The SCC response after one stressor session with simulated emergency response scenarios was blunted during TSD, unlike the sAA response. However, while sAA peaked twice in response to repeated stressor exposure when participants were well-rested (though not during TSD), SCC continued to decline after the first stressor exposure, potentially indicating a HPA refractory mechanism or habituation. Also, over participants there was no significant relationship between the magnitude of the stressor response between SCC and sAA. Taken together, our results suggest fundamentally distinct SAM and HPA axis responsivity to repeated acute stressors, with differential impact of TSD. Support (if any) ONR N00014-13-1-0302, PRMRP W81XWH-20-1-0442.
neurosciences,clinical neurology