Abstract:Highlights ► We propose a new type of rechargeable lithium-ion battery constructed with a 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 ·0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode and a hard carbon anode. ► The drawback of the high irreversible capacity loss, encountered at the first cycle of both positive and negative electrode, can be counterbalanced each other during operation by the electrode material combinations. ► The battery shows good reversibility with a sloping voltage from 1.5 V to 4.5 V and delivers capacities of 105 mA h g −1 and specific energies of 315 W h kg −1 based on the total weight of the both active electrode materials. Abstract We reported a new type of rechargeable lithium-ion battery consisting of a structurally integrated 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 ·0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode and a hard carbon anode. The drawback of the high irreversible capacity loss of both electrodes, occurring at the first charge/discharge process, can be counterbalanced each other. The battery shows good reversibility with a sloping voltage from 1.5 V to 4.5 V and delivers a capacity of 105 mA h g −1 and a specific energy of 315 W h kg −1 based on the total weight of the both active electrode materials. Keywords Lithium-ion batteries Structurally integrated materials Hard carbon Irreversible capacity 1 Introduction Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries have made great advances in the past 20 years and are extensively used for consumer electronic devices due to their high energy density and long cycle life. Moreover, they are viewed as crucial power sources for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs) which are considered to address the challenges of CO 2 emissions and oil shortage in the near future [1,2] . However, the performance of current lithium-ion batteries, which is linked intimately to the properties of electrode and electrolyte materials, falls short of meeting the requirements for HEVs and EVs in prospect [3–5] . Therefore, tremendous efforts have been dedicated to exploring new materials with high capacity, excellent cyclic performance, low cost and high safety features [1–5] . Recently, a family of structurally integrated x Li 2 M′O 3 ·(1 − x ) LiMO 2 electrode materials (M′ = Mn, Ti; and M = Mn, Ni, Co) receives a great deal of attention owing to their high capacity over 200 mA h g −1 when electrochemically activated above 4.4 V by the removal of Li + and oxygen from their structure on charge [6–10] . Such structurally integrated electrode materials are expected to replace the present LiCoO 2 cathode material in lithium ion batteries due to their high energy density and low cost [10,11] . In spite of their outstanding advantages, these materials show the large irreversible capacity on the first cycle ascribable to the two lithium ions extraction from per Li 2 MnO 3 unit above 4.4 V during first charge and to the insertion of only one lithium ion into the resulting component during subsequent discharge, which is deeply rooted in the reaction mechanism and is a factor to be taken into account in the practical applications [8,11,12] . On the other hand, ongoing research efforts are focused on tackling the drawback of the high irreversible capacity loss encountered at the negative electrode materials, such as alloys, hard carbon etc., which are caused by the formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) protective layer on the electrode surface and/or the trapping of some lithium in the electrode structure, resulting in the irreversible consumption of lithium ions in lithium-ion batteries [13–16] . With regard to this shortcoming, it may be counterbalanced by the surplus lithium of the first cycle in the x Li 2 M′O 3 (1 − x ) LiMO 2 electrode [10] . In the present work, we proposed a new lithium-ion battery with a 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode and a hard carbon anode, in which both electrode materials show an approximately coulombic efficiency of the first cycle. The electrochemical performance of the battery, including charge/discharge profile, cycling stability and rate capability, were evaluated. 2 Experimental The x Li 2 MnO 3 (1 − x ) LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 ( x = 0.4) material was synthesized from stoichiometric amounts of Li 2 CO 3 (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd.) and the Ni–Co–Mn precursor. The Ni–Co–Mn precursor was prepared by a co-precipitation method. A 2 M aqueous solution of NiSO 4 , CoSO 4 and MnSO 4 (Ni:Co:Mn = 0.24:0.12:0.64) was added into a 2 M aqueous solution of Na 2 CO 3 with 0.2 M NH 4 OH. The obtained precursor was filtered, dried and then sintered at 500 °C for 5 h. After proper mixing the pre-annealed precursor with the Li 2 CO 3 , the mixture was pressed into pellets, followed by calcination at 900 °C for 12 h in an air atmosphere and then dropped into liquid N 2 for quenching. The synthesis of hard carbon sample was performed on the basis of the previous work from a petroleum pitch [17,18] . Powder XRD measurement was carried out on a Rigaku D/MAX-IIA X-ray diffractometer using Cu-Ka radiation. Data were collected over the range 10° ≤ 2 θ ≤ 80°. The morphological characteristics of samples were checked by a JEOL JSM-6390 scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrodes were prepared by mixing 80 wt.% active material, 10 wt.% carbon black as conductive material and 10 wt.% polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) binder in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) solvent. Then, the slurry was cast onto an aluminum foil current collector, punched in the form of disks typically with a diameter of 12 mm and then dried at 80 °C for 12 h under vacuum. The hard carbon electrodes were fabricated by compressing a mixture of 94 wt.% hard carbon, 1 wt.% carbon black (Super-P) and 5 wt.% PVDF binder on copper foil using a procedure similar to that described for the 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrodes. Electrochemical measurements were carried out in CR2016-type coin cells at room temperature, consisting of a positive electrode, a separator and a negative electrode (lithium metal in half-cells). The cells were assembled in a glove-box filled with pure argon. The electrolyte solution was 1 M LiPF 6 -ethylene carbonate (EC)/diethyl carbonate (DMC)/ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) (1:1:1 by volume). 3 Results and discussion The crystal structure of as-prepared 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 and hard carbon samples were analyzed by power X-ray diffraction. For 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 material, all the observed sharp diffraction peaks in the XRD pattern of Fig. 1 (a) could be indexed to a trigonal (R-3m) phase, except for those broadened and low-intensity superlattice peaks around 21–25° [11] . The lines with values of 2 θ of ∼21° and 22° are the features of the integrated monoclinic Li 2 MnO 3 -like component and originate from the cation ordering in the transition metal layers, which is in good agreement with the literature data [6–9] . The XRD pattern of hard carbon material was shown in Fig. 1 (b). The major peak at 2 θ ∼ 24° is correlated to graphene-like structure of the sample and the weak peak at 2 θ ∼ 44° corresponds to the formation of a disordered carbon material according to the previous literature data [13] . From the power XRD pattern, we can calculate the crystallite size L c (1.17 nm) and L a (4.52 nm) determined from the 0 0 2 and 10 Bragg peaks using the Scherrer equation, respectively. The interlayer spacing ( d 0 0 2 = 0.372 nm) could be calculated using the Bragg equation. The morphology of the 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 and the hard carbon products was then checked by scanning electron microscope and shown in Fig. 2 (a and b) , respectively. As seen from the images, the hard carbon material has a non-uniform morphology. In contrast, 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 power is constituted by agglomerated particles on the order of 500 ∼ 1000 nm due to heat-treatment. Fig. 3 (a and b) exhibits the voltage profiles for initial two cycles with the electrode of 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 and hard carbon in lithium half-cells at room temperature, respectively. The 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode delivers a reversible capacity of 242 mA h g −1 when cycled between 4.8 and 2.0 V vs. Li/Li + at the current density of 20 mA g −1 , as shown in Fig. 3 (a). During the first charge to 4.8 V, the electrochemical reaction of lithium with 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode occurs in two distinct steps as follows: the first step measured at voltage < 4.4 V vs. Li/Li + corresponds to lithium extraction from LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 component with the concomitant oxidation of Ni 2+ to Ni 4+ and Co 3+ to Co 4+ and the second to the removal of lithium from Li 2 MnO 3 component of the electrode structure accompanied by oxygen evolution when charged above 4.4 V vs. Li/Li + [7] . And the coulombic efficiency of the first cycle was 78%, suggesting the high irreversible capacity loss. The large irreversible capacity is ascribed to the electrolyte oxidation at high potential and to the Li 2 O loss, which is determined by the reaction mechanism. On the first charge above 4.4 V, two lithium ions extract from per Li 2 MnO 3 unit and only one lithium ion inserts into the resulting MnO 2 component during subsequent discharge [11] . As shown in Fig. 3 (b) the insertion/removal of lithium in hard carbon occurs at the typical low voltage value, addressing reversible capacities of 205 mA h g −1 with 74% of the coulombic efficiency of the initial cycle from 0 V to 3.0 V at the 0.1 C rates. And the high irreversible capacity is a common electrochemical behavior in negative electrodes of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries due to the formation of SEI protective layer on the electrode surface and the trapping of some lithium in the electrode structure [13,18–21] . The cyclic performance of 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode and hard carbon electrode has been investigated in lithium half-cells and the results are depicted in Fig. 4 . The 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode behaved good capacity retention on cycling with an average capacity loss of 0.4 mA h g −1 per cycle during 50 charge–discharge cycles, in other words, the discharge capacities of the electrode maintained 92% of its initial reversible capacity, suggesting a good cycling performance. For hard carbon electrode, an excellent cyclic performance could be obtained with capacity retention of 96%, indicating that good cyclic performance can be expected for the full cell with a 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 as a positive electrode and a hard carbon as a negative electrode. Fig. 5 shows the rate performance of 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode and hard carbon electrode at different rates in lithium half-cells, varying from C/11 to 0.5 C. The cell was first cycled at C/11, then after several cycles, the rate was increased in stages to 0.5 C. As shown in Fig. 5 , 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode keeps the capacity retention of ca. 65% at 0.5 C vs. at C/11, while the hard carbon electrode shows a higher capacity retention of ca. 75%, indicating that the hard carbon electrode presents a better rate capability at higher current densities than that of 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode, which would limit the rate performance of the full battery as discussed later. Fig. 6 illustrates the charge/discharge curve of full lithium battery with a 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 (8.24 mg) cathode and a hard carbon (9.68 mg) anode (P/N = 0.85) cycled between 0 and 4.8 V at a current density of 20 mA g −1 at room temperature. In the lithium ion cell configuration, the lithium ions are derived from the 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode and are inserted into the hard carbon anode when first charged to 4.8 V. During this process, partial lithium ions in the 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode extract and react with electrolyte, resulting in the formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) protective layer on the hard carbon electrode surface. Then, the lithium ions are reinserted back into the positive electrode material on subsequent discharge. Thus, the disadvantage of the large irreversible capacity loss in the hard carbon electrode could be counterbalanced during the operation of the full cell through the given electrode materials combination. The cell delivers an average voltage ∼3.0 V with capacities of 105 mA h g −1 based on the total weight of both active electrode materials. However, the coulombic efficiency of the first cycle in the full lithium battery is 71%, which is a bit lower than that of the 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode and the hard carbon electrode in lithium half-cells. This could be related to an irreversible wastage of lithium ions in side reactions [22] . As expected, good cyclic performance of the full lithium batteries ( Fig. 7 ) at different current densities could be obtained, consistent with the structure stability of the 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode and the hard carbon electrode. Moreover, after the initial 2 cycles at the current density of 20 mA g −1 at room temperature, Fig. 7 presents the rate capability of the full cells cycling at different rates, varying from C/11 to 0.5 C. It is evident that the cells have poor rate capability associated with the poor rate capability of 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode, which can be enhanced through utilization of well-designed nanomaterials and surface modifications of the electrodes [23–28] . With respect to the safety and reliability, improvements can be achieved by adopting polymer electrolytes or ionic liquids in place of the present LiPF 6 -organic carbonate solution electrolyte [29,30] . Furthermore, the electrochemical performance of full lithium battery at different working temperatures is checked and presented in Fig. 8 . The battery was first cycled for 10 cycles at 0.2 C rates from 0 to 4.8 V at room temperature (25 °C) then tested at −10 °C and 50 °C. The trend of the charge/discharge profiles shown in Fig. 8 displays the influence of temperature on the battery performance, which indicates that the battery exhibits poor performance of the energy storage over wide temperature ranges, especially at low temperatures, suggesting the operational temperature limitations for practical applications. We speculate that the poor performance of the full cell at low temperature is mainly associated with the positive electrode. And the charge/discharge curves of 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 electrode at different temperatures are given in Fig. 9 . It is clearly observed that the positive electrode shows poor capacities at −10 °C. This may be basically caused by slow kinetics of the electrode and more work should be done to improve its temperature performance in the future. 4 Conclusions In summary, we developed a new type of rechargeable lithium-ion battery constructed with a 0.4Li 2 MnO 3 0.6LiMn 0.4 Ni 0.4 Co 0.2 O 2 cathode and a hard carbon anode. The battery has shown a sloping voltage from 4.5 V to 1.5 V and delivers a capacity of 105 mA h g −1 based on the total mass of both active electrode materials. The drawback of the high irreversible capacity loss, encountered at the first cycle of positive and negative electrode materials, can be counterbalanced each other during operation of the full cell. This confirms the potential application of structurally integrated x Li 2 M′O 3 (1 − x ) LiMO 2 electrode materials in the next generation of lithium ion batteries. It is noted that the performance of the new battery should be further improved through optimization of the system, including cell design, utilization of well-designed nanomaterials and surface modifications of the electrodes and polymer electrolytes or ionic liquids as the electrolyte. Acknowledgements This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 20925312 ), the State Key Basic Research Program of PRC ( 2007CB209703 , 2011CB935903 ) and Shanghai Science & Technology Committee ( 09XD1400300 , 10JC1401500 and 08DZ2270500 ). References [1] M. Armand J.M. Tarascon Nature 414 2001 359 [2] A.S. Arico P. Bruce B. Scrosati J.M. Tarascon W.V. Schalkwijk Nat. Mater. 4 2005 366 [3] P.G. Bruce B. Scrosati J.M. Tarascon Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 2008 2930 [4] C. Liu F. Li L.P. Ma H.M. Cheng Adv. Mater. 22 2010 E28 [5] B. Scrosati J. Garche J. Power Sources 195 2010 2419 [6] S.H. Kang K. Amine J. Power Sources 124 2003 533 [7] C.S. Johnson J.S. Kim C. Lefief N. Li J.T. Vaughey M.M. Thackeray Electrochem. Commun. 6 2004 1085 [8] M.M. Thackeray C.S. Johnson J.T. Vaughey N. Li S.A. Hackney J. Mater. Chem. 15 2005 2257 [9] A.R. Armstrong M. Holzapfel P. Novak C.S. Johnson S.H. Kang M.M. Thackeray P.G. Bruce J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 2006 8694 [10] M.M. Thackeray S.H. Kang C.S. Johnson J.T. Vaughey R. Benedek S.A. Hackney J. Mater. Chem. 17 2007 3112 [11] C.S. Johnson N. Li C. Lefief J.T. Vaughey M.M. Thackeray Chem. Mater. 20 2008 6095 [12] S.H. Kang V.G. Pol I. Belharouak M.M. Thackeray J. Electrochem. Soc. 157 2010 A267 [13] F. Bonino S. Brutti P. Reale B. Scrosati L. Gherghel J. Wu K. Mullen Adv. Mater. 17 2005 743 [14] D. Larcher L.Y. Beaulieu O. Mao A.E. Geoge J.R. Dahn J. Electrochem. Soc. 147 2000 1703 [15] S. Matsumoto 49th Battery Symposium, Sakai, Japan, vol. 3 2008 E10 [16] J. Hassoun S. Panero P. Reale B. Scrosati Adv. Mater. 21 2009 4807 [17] H. Ohashi, Y. Shigaki, Eur. Pat. Appl., EP726606 (1996). [18] K. Gotoh M. Maeda A. Nagai A. Goto M. Tansho K. Hashi T. Shimizu H. Ishida J. Power Sources 162 2006 1322 [19] Q. Wang H. Li L.Q. Chen X.J. Huang Carbon 39 2001 2211 [20] J.R. Dahn T. Zheng Y. Liu J.S. Xue Science 270 1995 590 [21] D.A. Stevens J.R. Dahn J. Electrochem. Soc. 147 2000 1271 [22] Y. Yang M.T. McDowell A. Jackson J.J. Cha S.S. Hong Y. Cui Nano Lett. 10 2010 1486 [23] M.G. Kim M. Jo Y.S. Hong J. Cho Chem. Commun. 2009 218 [24] G.Z. Wei X. Lu F.S. Ke L. Huang J.T. Li Z.X. Wang Z.Y. Zhou S.G. Sun Adv. Mater. 22 2010 4364 [25] M.S. Park J.W. Lee W. Choi D. Im S.G. Doo K.S. Park J. Mater. Chem. 20 2010 7208 [26] A. Ito D. Li Y. Ohsawa Y. Sato J. Power Sources 183 2008 344 [27] Y. Wu A. Manthiram Electrochem. Solid State Lett. 9 2006 A221 [28] J.M. Zheng Z.R. Zhang X.B. Wu Z.X. Dong Z. Zhu Y. Yang J. Electrochem. Soc. 155 2008 A775 [29] P. Reale S. Panero B. Scrosati J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 2005 A1949 [30] G. Armstrong A.R. Armstrong P.G. Bruce P. Reale B. Scrosati Adv. Mater. 18 2006 2597

Abstract:A simple one-step route using gas template method is applied to synthesize macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 which is characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer–Emmett–Telle (BET) surface area, charge–discharge tests and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. The as-synthesized material shows pure crystalline phase of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 , while the microstructure is comprised of macrospores ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 μm. The first discharge capacity is of 174 mAh g −1 at 0.1 C rate, which is much higher than that of the material synthesized by the conventional solid state reaction method. Furthermore, the macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 material shows remarkable rate capacity and cycle stability, which may be attributed to the shorter lithium ion diffusion distance and better electrolyte penetration. Keywords Macroporous Rate capacity Lithium manganese nickel oxide Lithium ion battery Cathode materials 1 Introduction Since today's prevalence of microelectronic devices, there is an urgent need for power supplies with higher energy and power densities. Lithium ion battery is a promising candidate that meets these requirements. The positive electrode material plays an important role in the electrochemical performance of a lithium ion battery. Layered LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 attracts a lot of attention because it has advantage such as being cheaper, safer and capable of providing a higher capacity than LiCoO 2 [1] . The main drawback, however, limits its wide application is its poor conductivity [2–5] . Two popular methods to improve the performance of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 as a cathode material for lithium ion batteries are to coat the particles with electronic conductivity agents such as carbon and to modify its micro-morphology. However, the process of both carbon coating and nano-sized particle synthesis is quite complicated [6–9] . In addition, although nano-particulate positive electrodes can improve rate capacity by decreasing lithium ion diffusion distance, such an improvement is achieved at the expense of volumetric energy density, because lower density of nanoparticulate-based electrodes means greater volume [10–12] . Recently some groups reported that the porous structure can meliorate the rate capacity remarkably. Ergang et al. proved that LiCoO 2 with a macroporous structure was effective in decreasing the solid-state diffusion length within the electrode, thereby improving its rate capacity [10] . Furthermore, Kuthanapillil et al. reported that Li(Ni 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 )O 2 with a macroporous structure delivered high storage capacity, superior capacity retention and power rate [12] . These results obviously serve to illustrate the important role of morphology in determining the performance of cathode materials in lithium ion batteries. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed to synthesis layered LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 with a macroporous structure and its electrochemical performance is investigated as a cathode material for lithium ion batteries. 2 Experimental 2.1 Preparation of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 Macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 was synthesized by dissolving LiCH 3 COO·2H 2 O, Ni(CH 3 COO) 2 ·4H 2 O and Mn(CH 3 COO) 2 ·4H 2 O in quantities corresponding to 0.02 mol of stoichiometric LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 in 100 mL of water containing 0.15 mol of formaldehyde (36.5% in water, methanol stabilized), 0.1 mol of resorcinol (99%) and 0.5 × 10 −3 mol of Li 2 CO 3 serve as 5 mol% excess of Li source. The obtained solution was heat-treated at 60 °C until viscous and then baked at 90 °C for 24 h, followed by calcination at 900 °C for 10 h. For comparison, conventional solid state reaction method was used to synthesize LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 by mixing a stoichimetric amount of Mn(CH 3 COO) 2 ·4H 2 O, Ni(CH 3 COO) 2 ·4H 2 O and C 2 H 2 O 4 ·2H 2 O (molar ratio of Ni: Mn: oxalic acid is 1:1:2) and sintering at 900 °C. All the procedures were carried out in ambient atmosphere and all the raw materials are analytical reagents which were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Company and used without any further purification. 2.2 Characterizations The XRD measurement was carried out on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffraction using Cu Kα radiation source ( λ = 1.5406 Å) with a scan rate of 1 ° min −1 from 10 to 80 °. Lattice parameters of the materials and the ratio of Li/Ni exchange in the structure were calculated and refined by Rietveld analysis (Accelrys MS Modeling 3.0.1). Morphological studies were conducted using a JEOL JMS 6390 scanning electron microscope. BET surface area measurement was carried out on an automated surface area and pore size analyzer (QUDRASORB SI, Quantachrome Instruments U.S.). 2.3 Electrochemical measurement To evaluate electrochemical performance, composite electrodes were constructed by mixing the active materials, super P carbon black and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in the weight ratio of 70:20:10. The mixture was rolled into a thin sheet with uniform thickness and then pressed onto an aluminum mesh. The cathode was circular with a 10 mm diameter and dried under vacuum at 120 °C for 24 h. Typical loading of the active material was 0.0127 g cm −2 . The test cell was assembled in an argon-filled glove box with lithium pellet as anode, a Celgard 2300 sheet as separator and 1 M LiPF 6 in a mixed ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 in volume) solution as electrolyte. The charge–discharge measurements were carried out in a potential range from 2.5 to 4.3 V (vs. Li + /Li) using a Land Cycler (Wuhan Land Electronic Co. Ltd.). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed on an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660A, CHI Company). The frequency was ranged from 0.01 to 100,000 Hz with an amplitude of 0.005 V. All the tests were performed at room temperature. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Structure characterization Fig. 1 presents powder XRD patterns of the as-synthesized LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 and LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 obtained by conventional solid state reaction method. All the peaks are attributed to layered structure of α-NaFeO 2 with a R-3m space group and no other peaks are observed, which indicates that pure layered LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 was obtained. The sharp peaks indicate excellent crystalline of those materials. The influence of Li/Ni exchange to the lattice structure which has an important relationship to the electrochemical performance of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 was previously reported [2,13–17] . The intensity ratio of I (0 0 3) / I (1 0 4) is related to the degree of cation mixing in the lattice structure. The higher I (0 0 3) / I (1 0 4) intensity ratio is, the higher degree of Li–M(Ni, Mn) order in their respective layers is [18–20] . The ratio of I (0 0 3) / I (1 0 4) in macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 is obviously higher than LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 synthesized by the solid state method which indicates that macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 has a higher degree of Li–M(Ni, Mn) order in their respective layers. To confirm it, Rietveld refinement and calculation of Li/Ni exchange in the lattice structure based on the XRD data was carried out. Based on its α-NaFeO 2 structure model (space group R-3m ), the 3a sites were occupied equally by Mn and Ni and the 3b sites were occupied by Li [21,22] . During the refinement process, the occupancy of the 3a sites by Mn was maintained at 0.5, and the total amount of Li and Ni within the materials was fixed, while the distribution of Li and Ni between the 3a and 3b sites was allowed to vary. The refinement converged on a model in which 7.7 mol% of Ni ions in the transition-metal sites were exchanged for Li, that is, the ion distribution is described by the formula [Li 0.923 Ni 0.077 ] 3b (Li 0.077 Ni 0.423 Mn 0.5 ) 3a O 2 . This model provides an excellent fit to the data, as can be seen in Fig. 2 , corresponding to Rwp of 4.46% and Rp of 3.82%. The refined unit cell parameters in a hexagonal setting were a = 2.8896 and c = 14.2893 Å. These values, the refined structure, and the ratio of Li/Ni exchange are in good agreement with those previously reported [23,24] . The same Rietveld refinement process was carried on LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 synthesized by solid state reaction method and the calculated result is 9.8 mol% of Ni ions in the transition-metal sites were exchanged by Li ion. Obviously, the ratio of Li/Ni exchange in the material synthesized by the gas-template method is smaller than that of the material synthesized by conventional solid state reaction method. The possible reason is that the solution-based method can let the reactants mix and react at the atomic level while the solid state reaction method could not blend the raw materials thoroughly and well-proportioned by using mortar and pestle. 3.2 Morphology characterization The morphology of the materials was examined by using scanning electron microscopy, which is presented in Fig. 3 . The images indicate a disorder macroporous morphology composed of individual particles of narrow size distribution, in the range of 0.2–0.5 μm, fused together to form agglomerates within which the macroporous range from 1 to 3 μm. The microparticles and multiple macroporous in this material result from the precursors and methods we used. The utilization of a solution-based method provides good mix of the constituent ions at the atomic scale. Resorcinol and formaldehyde will react and generate materials which transform to volatile products on heating and results in the formation of the observed macroporous structure. Compared to the image of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 obtained by solid state reaction method, although the particle size is similar, the nanoparticle material densely piles up without any pores. Fig. 4 gives the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 materials synthesized by different methods. The specific surface area of the macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 is of 8.870 m 2 g −1 which is much higher than the sample synthesized by solid state reaction method (2.929 m 2 g −1 ). The pores and tunnels in the macroporous sample account for the increasing of the specific surface area. 3.3 Electrochemical characterization Fig. 5 presents the first discharge capacity of the LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 samples at 0.1 C rate. Here 140 mAh g −1 is assumed to be roughly equivalent to 1 C. The first discharge capacity of the macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 is 174 mAh g −1 , higher than that of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 prepared by solid state reaction method which is only 144 mAh g −1 . The possible reason is that all the precursors in the solution were mixed at the atomic level, resulting in a compositionally homogeneous product and macroporous structure that yields superior performance compared to the conventional solid state reaction method which the raw materials used cannot blend thoroughly by using mortar and pestle. These electrochemical results are accordance with the Rietveld refinement of XRD data, the lower ratio of Li/Ni exchange in the lattice structure, the better electrochemical performance [2,13–17] . Fig. 6 presents the rate capacity of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 samples cycled between 2.5 and 4.3 V at different discharge rates. Macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 behaves higher discharge capacity than material synthesized by conventional solid state method at 0.1 C, 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C and 2 C. At 1 C the capacity of macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 can reach 123 mAh g −1 , while the LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 synthesized by solid state methods degenerates and the capacity drops to 90 mAh g −1 . At 2 C the discharge capacity of the macroporous structure is 108 mAh g −1 , while the discharge capacity of the materials synthesized by solid state reaction method only shows 65 mAh g −1 . The results illustrate that the LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 with macroporous structure exhibits superior rate capability compared with the materials synthesized by solid state reaction method. Similar results have been obtained for LiCoO 2 and Li(Ni 1/3 Co 1/3 Mn 1/3 )O 2 materials with macroporous structure [10,12] . Fig. 7 presents the cycling stability at 0.1 C and Fig. 8 presents the cyclablity of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 samples at 0.5 C rate. It can be clearly seen that macroporous material behaves larger discharge capacity and better capacity retention. The LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 synthesized by solid state reaction method drops greatly at 0.5 C rate, the first discharge capacity is of 126 mAh g −1 , after 40 cycles the discharge capacity is only 92 mAh g −1 , while the first discharge capacity of the macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 is 153 mAh g −1 at 0.5 C and after 40 cycles, the discharge capacity still keeps at 137 mAh g −1 . Obviously, the macroporous materials not only have a larger discharge capacity but also better capacity retention, the macroporous structure LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 owns a significant advantage over on the aspects of rate capability and cyclability which could be account for that the macroporous structure materials has less Li/Ni exchange ratio and can absorb more electrolyte thus shortening the diffusion distances of lithium ions. 3.4 Lithium ion diffusion coefficient calculation The intercalation and de-intercalation mechanism of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 can be described as: (1) LiNi 0.5 M n 0.5 O 2 ⇄ discharge charge x L i + + x e − + L i ( 1 − x ) N i 0.5 M n 0.5 O 2 Fig. 9 shows the EIS curves of both macroporous LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 and the one prepared by solid state reaction method. For both of them, a semicircle in high frequency region and a line in low frequency region were observed. The lithium ion diffusion coefficient can be calculated from the formula as following: (2) D = R 2 T 2 2 A 2 n 4 F 4 C 2 σ 2 where A is the surface area of the electrode, n is the number of the electrons per molecule attending the electronic transfer reaction, F is the Faraday constant, C is the concentration of lithium ion in LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 electrode, R is the gas constant, T is the room temperature in our experiment, σ is the slope of the line Z ′ ∼ ω −1/2 which can be obtained from the line of Z ′ ∼ ω −1/2 (shown in Fig. 8 ), respectively. (3) C = n V = ( m / M ) V = ( ρ V / M ) V = ρ M where the constant values of F and R are 96,500 C mol −1 and 8.314 J K −1 mol −1 , respectively. A is the electrode area which is 0.785 × 10 −4 m 2 , n is 2, T is 298 K, C can be calculated from the density and the molecular weight of the materials synthesized by different methods, which are 1.2 × 10 4 mol m −3 . Deduction process is provided in Eq. (3) . The calculated lithium diffusion coefficient D (cm 2 s −1 ) of macroporous material is 3.17 × 10 −13 cm 2 s −1 , however that of the material synthesized by the conventional solid state method is only 1.41 × 10 −13 cm 2 s −1 . Obviously, the material with macroporous structure has a greater lithium ion diffusion coefficient, which may be attributed to the smaller Li/Ni exchange ratio in the lattice structure [2] . Both the larger Li ion diffusion coefficient and the shorter pathway for Li ion transfer may account for better electrochemical performance of the macroporous cathode. This result is consistent with the charge and discharge results. Macroporous material with larger lithium ion diffusion coefficient has higher capacity when charged and discharged at higher rates and possesses better rate performance. 4 Conclusions A simple approach was successfully used to synthesize pure R-3m phase and well-crystallized LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 with macroporous structure. One step reaction and some cheap reaction vessels can meet the synthesized requirement. This simple synthesized method has a potential industrial applicability in the future. Electrochemical test results show that LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 with macroporous structure displays a higher discharge capacity, better cycle stability and much better rate capability than that of LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 synthesized by the conventional solid state reaction method. The excellent electrochemical performance could be attributed to its lower Li/Ni exchange ratio and larger lithium ion diffusion coefficient. Meanwhile, the macroporous structure can provide more pores for increasing the electrode–electrolyte interface area which means better electrolyte penetration. Acknowledgments This work is financially supported by a Grant from the National Basic Research Program of China (“973” Program, no. 2009CB220100 ), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (“863” Program, no. 2009AA033701 ) and Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality ( 08DZ2270500 ), China. References [1] T. Ohzuku Y. Makimura Chem. Lett. 8 2001 744 [2] K.S. Kang Y.S. Meng J. Breger C.P. Grey G. Ceder Science 311 2006 977 [3] S.H. Kang J. Kim M.E. Stoll D. Abraham Y.K. Sun K. Amine J. Power Sources 112 2002 41 [4] A. Manthiram J. Choi W. Choi Solid State Ionics 177 2006 2629 [5] B.L. Cushing J.B. Goodenough Solid State Sci. 4 2002 1487 [6] A.M. Hashem A.E.A. Ghany K. Nikolowski H. Ehrenberg Ionics 16 2010 305 [7] X. Wang F. Zhou X.M. Zhao Z.D. Zhang M.R. Ji C.M. Tang T. Shen H.G. Zheng J. Cryst. Growth 267 2004 184 [8] Y.K. Zhou H.L. Li J. Mater. Chem. 12 2002 681 [9] N. Yabuuchi Y. Koyama N. Nakayama T. Ohzuku J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 2005 A1434 [10] N.S. Ergang J.C. Lytle H. Yan A. Stein J. Electrochem. Soc. 152 2005 A1989 [11] L. Li W.H. Meyer G. Wegner M.W. Mehrens Adv. Mater. 17 2005 984 [12] M.S. Kuthanapillil P.G. Bruce Adv. Mater. 18 2006 2330 [13] Q. Wu X.L. Li M. Yan Z.Y. Jiang Electrochem. Commun. 5 2003 878 [14] M.S. Islam R.A. Davies J.D. Gale Chem. Mater. 15 2003 4280 [15] J. Breger Y.S. Meng Y. Hinuma S. Kumar K. Kang S.H. Yang G. Ceder C.P. Grey Chem. Mater. 18 2006 4768 [16] Y.K. Sun Y.C. Bae S.T. Myung J. Appl. Electrochem. 35 2005 151 [17] M.V. Reddy G.V. Subba Rao B.V.R. Chowdari Electrochim. Acta 50 2005 3375 [18] Y. Hinuma Y.S. Meng K. Kang G. Ceder Chem. Mater. 19 2007 1790 1800 [19] M. Yoshio Y. Todorov K. Yamato H. Noguchi J. Itoh M. Okada T. Mouri J. Power Sources 74 1998 46 [20] S.H. Park Y.K. Sun Electrochim. Acta 50 2004 431 [21] B.J. Hwang T.H. Yu M.Y. Cheng R. Santhanam J. Mater. Chem. 19 2009 4536 [22] Y. Makimura T. Ohzuku J. Power Sources 119–121 2003 156 [23] J. Guo L.F. Jiao H.T. Yuan H.X. Li M. Zhang Y.M. Wang Electrochim. Acta 51 2006 3731 [24] S.B. Schougaard J. Breger M. Jiang C.P. Grey J.B. Goodenough Adv. Mater. 18 2006 905

A new rechargeable lithium-ion battery with a xLi2MnO3·(1−x) LiMn0.4Ni0.4Co0.2O2 cathode and a hard carbon anode

Radially Oriented Single‐Crystal Primary Nanosheets Enable Ultrahigh Rate and Cycling Properties of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 Cathode Material for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Synthesis and Electrochemical Characteristics of Li₁.₂(Ni₀.₂Mn₀.₆)ₓ(Co₀.₄Mn₀.₄)y(Ni₀.₄Mn₀.₄)₁₋ₓ₋yO₂ (0 ≤ X + Y ≤ 1) Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries

Enhanced electrochemical performance of Li 1.2 Mn 0.54 Ni 0.13 Co 0.13 O 2 cathode material coated with Li + -conductive Li 2 SiO 3 for lithium ion batteries

A novel method for preparation of macroposous lithium nickel manganese oxygen as cathode material for lithium ion batteries

Interphase Modification of Li(Ni0.5Co0.2Mn0.3)O2 Based Lithium Battery Electrode Materials by Depolarized and Pre-Lithiation for High Capacity and Cycling Performance

Enhanced Cathode Performance: Mixed Al 2 O 3 and LiAlO 2 Coating of Li 1.2 Ni 0.13 Co 0.13 Mn 0.54 O 2

Simple Glycerol-Assisted and Morphology-Controllable Solvothermal Synthesis of Lithium-Ion Battery-Layered Li 1.2 Mn 0.54 Ni 0.13 Co 0.13 O 2 Cathode Materials

Synthesis and Characterization of LiNi0.6Mn0.4−xCoxO2 As Cathode Materials for Li-ion Batteries

LiFexMn1−xPO4: A cathode for lithium-ion batteries

Synthesis and Electrochemical Performance of High-Capacity 0.34li2mno3·0.66limn0.63ni0.24co0.13o2 Cathode Materials Using a Couette–Taylor Reactor

Electrochemical Performance of Layer-Structured Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 Cathode Active Materials Synthesized by Carbonate Co-Precipitation

Li[Li0.20Ni0.128Co0.136Mn0.536]O2 Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Layered Li2MnO3·3LiNi0.5−xMn0.5−xCo2xO2 Microspheres with Mn-rich Cores As High Performance Cathode Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries

Synthesis and Electrochemical Properties of Li-rich Cathode Material Li[NixLi(1/3−2x/3)Mn(2/3−x/3)]O2 (x = 1/4, 1/3) for Li-ion Battery

Effect of carbon coating on electrochemical performance of Li 1.048 Mn 0.381 Ni 0.286 Co 0.286 O 2 cathode material for lithium-ion batteries

Improved Electrochemical Performance of Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 by Surface Modification with Li-Ion-Conductive Li2TiO3

Structural and electrochemical properties of LiNi0.5Mn0.5 - xAlxO2 (x = 0, 0.02, 0.05, 0.08, and 0.1) cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries

Improved Electrochemical Performances of Li- and Mn-Rich Layered Oxides 0.4li4/3mn2/3o2·0.6lini1/3co1/3mn1/3o2 Cathode Material by Co3O4 Coating

(Digital Presentation) Cobalt Free Cathode Synthesized By Sacrificial Template (α-MnOOH) for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries

Prelithiation Activates Li(Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2)O-2 for High Capacity and Excellent Cycling Stability