Temperature Versus Concentration Phase Diagram of Mg- and Si-doped CuGeO3

T Masuda,K Ina,K Hadama,I Tsukada,K Uchinokura,H Nakao,M Nishi,Y Fujii,K Hirota,G Shirane,YJ Wang,V Kiryukhin,RJ Birgeneau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4526(99)02764-7
IF: 2.988
2000-01-01
Physica B Condensed Matter
Abstract:We studied the temperature versus concentration (T–x) phase diagram in Cu1−xMgxGeO3 by susceptibility measurements, synchrotron X-ray diffraction and neutron diffraction and the first-order phase transition between dimerized-antiferromagnetic and uniform-antiferromagnetic phases reported by Masuda et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4566] was established. We found that the T–x phase diagram of Cu1−xMxGeO3(M=Zn,Ni) is similar to that of Cu1−xMgxGeO3, while that of CuGe1−xSixO3 is qualitatively different.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?