Abstract:Background and Objective Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been applied to treat pain and disability in patients with post-traumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture for many years. However, the midterm and long-term results of THA for this unique population are still controversial. According to previous studies, we found that uncemented acetabular reconstructions were usually performed in patients who were most likely to have the best results and an abnormal acetabular structure was usually the reason for THA failure. In this study, we evaluated the midterm results of using uncement acetabular components to treat posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture. In addition, we investigated the effects of different acetabular fracture treatments and fracture patterns on THA. Materials and Methods Between January 2000 to December 2003, 34 uncemented acetabular reconstructions were performed in 34 patients for posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fractures. Among them, 31 patients underwent complete clinical and radiographic follow-up for an average of 6.3 years (range, 3.1–8.4 years). There were 22 men and 9 women. The patients9 average age was 51 ± 12 years (range, 27–74 years) at the time of arthroplasty. The average interval from fracture to THA was 5.58 ± 4.42 years (range, 0.75–17.5 years). Of the 31 patients, 19 had undergone ORIF (open-reduction group) and 12 had received conservative treatment for the acetabular fractures (conservative-treatment group). Then, 14 had simple pattern fractures (simple group) and 17 had complex pattern fractures (complex group). After midterm follow-up, the radiographic and clinic results of the different groups were compared. Results During 6.3 years9 follow up, no infection occurred and no revision was needed in the 31 patients. In the open-reduction and conservative-treatment groups, the respective averages for duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, and amount of blood transfused were 138 ± 29 minutes and 98 ± 16 minutes (P 4°. The average horizontal migration of cup was 1.48 ± 0.46 mm (range, 0.7–2.33 mm), and the average vertical migration was 1.41 ± 0.54 mm (range, 0.5–2.51 mm). The average rate of polyethylene liner wear was 0.25 ± 0.11 mm/y (range, 0.03–0.41 mm/y). Average wear rates were 0.25 ± 0.12 mm/y and 0.24 ± 0.11 mm/y for the open-reduction group and the conservative-treatment group (P = .72), respectively, and 0.24 ± 0.13 mm/y and 0.26 ± 0.10 mm/y in the complex group and the simple group (P = .67), respectively. The average rate of polyethylene wear for all patients was positively related to BMI (r = .36; P = .047). After THA, all 31 patients had a reconstructed hip center within 20 mm of vertical and horizontal symmetry compared with the contralateral hip, including 27 patients (87%) with anatomic restoration and 4 patients with reconstructed hip center between 10–20 mm of vertical and horizontal symmetry. Anatomic restoration was positively related to fracture treatment (r = .48; P = .006), but it had no relation to fracture pattern (r = .16; P = .40). Conclusion Uncement acetabular reconstruction following acetabular fracture had favorable midterm results. Fracture treatments and patterns are associated with increased operative time and hemorrhage amount. Open reduction and internal fixation of fracture favours anatomic restoration of hip rotational center.

Traumatic Coxarthritis Treated with Bone Impaction Grafting and Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Observation of Particulate Cancellous Bone Impaction Grafting in Combination with Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acetabular Reconstruction.

Structural Bone-Grafting with Uncemented Cup for Acetabular Deficiency and Reconstruction

Extensive impacted bone grafting for acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty

Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze‐Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction

Treatment of Acetabular Bone Defect in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Application of Curettage of Osteolysis Lesion and Morselized Bone Grafting for Treatments in Periprosthetic Acetabular Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Treatment of Congenital Hip Dislocation Patient with Total Hip Arthroplasty by Reconstruction of the Acetabulum with Osteotomy and Protrusion of Acetabular Medial Wall

Titanium Wire Mesh and Impact Bone Allograft in Treating Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

[Total Hip Arthroplasty with Uncemented Cup and Femoral Head Autografts for Coxarthrosis Due to Dysplasia].

Mid-term results of impact allogenic morsellised cancellous bone grafts and cementless polyporous cup reconstructing extensive acetabular bone defect in revision surgery

Application of modular porous tantalum cup in total hip arthroplasty with lacunar acetabular defects

[Application of metal cushion block combined with Jumbo cup in reconstruction of acetabular bone defect in revision of artificial hip joint]

Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defect by tantalum trabecular metal cup combining tantalum augment

Application of Jumbo Cup in Acetabular Revisions for Patients with Massive Acetabular Bone Deficiency

Mid-term Results of Revision Surgery Using Double-Trabecular Metal Cups Alone or Combined with Impaction Bone Grafting for Complex Acetabular Defects

[Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect with Wire Mesh and Impacted Bone Graft in Cemented Acetabular Revision].

Special Titanium Plate and Bone Grafting for Severe Acetabular Bone Defect in Total Hip Joint Revision

Midterm Results of Uncemented Acetabular Reconstruction for Post-Traumatic Arthritis Secondary to Acetabular Fracture

Treatment of Acetabular Fracture with Total Hip Replacement

[Biological total hip arthroplasty combined with impacting bone grafting for the treatment of moderate to severe acetabular invagination secondary to rheumatoid arthritis]