Comparison of Triple-Endobutton and clavicular hook plate implantation for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Wang Hai-ming,Chen Yun-feng,Lu Ye,Zhang Chang-qing,Zeng Bing-fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2012.17.016
2012-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Clavicular hook plate once serves as the preferred solution of the acromioclavicular joint dislocation,but there are still many complications after implantation.Double-Endobutton for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation has a satisfactory short-term follow-up result.OBJECTIVE:To improve the Double-Endobutton,to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligament with Triple-Endobutton technology,and then to compare the clinical efficacy of Triple-Endobutton technology and clavicular hook plate for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.METHODS:Forty-five patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation were collected to perform the control observation,23 patients were treated with Triple-Endobutton and 22 patients were treated with AO clavicular hook plate.Preoperative assessment of patients showed there was no significant differences in general information.Related indicators during surgery and hospitalization,postoperative visual analogue score,shoulder Constant score and complications were analyzed.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The overall efficacy of Triple-Endobutton for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation was similar to clavicular hook plate,but the Triple-Endobutton had the advantages of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction,hard internal fixation and early activities,as well as the low incidence of shoulder pain and shoulder activity limitation,shorter recovery time and fewer complications postoperatively.Triple-Endobutton had a good biocompatibility and could long-term stay in the body with no need to remove,thus avoiding secondary surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?