Abstract:This paper is to sort out the content and explore the characteristics of the three research works on “Shangshu” of Yuhui (柳僖, 1773-1837), a Confusion scholar in the late Joseon Dynasty. ShinChak(申綽), a famous scholar of textual research in the late Joseon Dynasty, mentioned in a letter to ChongYak-Yong(丁若鏞) that Yuhui’s textual research on “Guwen Shangshu古文尙書” was meticulous and detailed. He also praised Yuhui's very high attainment in interpreting “Chunqiu 春秋” in “Taegyosingi胎敎新記序”. However, as Yuhui’s works on Confucian classics were not included in several famous Korean series such as “The Complete Collection of the Korean Study of Confucian Classics韓國經學資料集成”, “Korean Literary Collections in Classical Chinese韓國文集叢刊”, “Korean Anthology in History韓國歷代文集叢書”, and they were not published in separate volumes, they have received little attention from the academic circles. Based on “Yuhui Chronicle”, Yuhui's personal notes and many other clues, this paper first speculates that Yuhui's publications should have the following sequence: firstly “SangSeoKoGeummoonSongEui尙書今古文訟疑”(1824), then “SeoChaejeonboseol書蔡傳補說”(presumably written between 1824-1825), to be followed by “SeoGo書詁”(written after August 1825). In addition, his “Shangshu” theory has the following characteristics and significance: 1. Analysis based on textual research: In the debate on ancient prose, if ChongYak-Yong is compared to Yan Ruoqiu(閻若璩), Yuhui can be compared to Mao Qiling(毛奇齡). The reason is that those who supported the ancient text “Shangshu” in the Joseon Dynasty mostly refuted the study of school examination because of the sixteen-character mentality. They think analysing the classics through textual research is like “trusting the leaves and query the root” and is a waste of effort. However, Yuhui’s method of analysing classics was different from that of the predecessors. He adopted textual research, going through systematically the historical records of the past dynasties and the theories of the predecessors one by one. At the same time, Yuhui often cited Mao Qiling's theory as his own supporting evidence, which is very different from the previous Korean scholars who belittled Xihe. 2. Interpreting the classics through linguistics: Due to innate factors, Korean Confucianists seldom used the convenience of geographical location to discuss the authenticity of the ancient “Shangshu” like the Ming and Qing scholars who adopted the methods of geographical research and ancient and modern phonetics. Instead, they defended the ancient text “Shangshu”. based on viewpoints such as “the words of the sages are inviolable”, “as Zhu Zi never said this is a fake book, it must be authentic”, “the meaning is correct, so it is not a fake book”. In addition to Yuhui's method of textual research to affirm his own views, it can also be seen that Yuhui used his expertise in Guoyinxue to explain the classics. For example, on the issue of Fu Sheng's dictation of the classics, Yuhui not only pointed out that similar characters might have caused errors, but also cited examples of errors caused by sounds. 3. Revising and supplementing “Shu Ji Zhuan書集傳”: Although “Shu Ji Zhuan” has been standing for hundreds of years since the Yuan Dynasty, there have been views of support and opposition since its compilation at the end of the Song Dynasty. Yuhui's “SeoChaejeonboseol” and “SeoGo” show that Korean Confucianists did not completely stick to the “Shu Ji Zhuan” which represents Zhu Xi's last will and would also identify the mistakes and suggest amendments to the text when the meaning was not clear. 4. Compilation of lost merits: Many ancient theories are quoted in the three works, such as those of Ma Qianluan馬遷鸞 from the Song Dynasty and Li Pan李槃 from the Ming Dynasty, which is very rare. If “MunTong文通” can be organized and understood,

Annotated Catalog of the Only Existing Copies of Manchu Ancient Texts in Peking University Library

Primary Exploration on Block-Printed Books from Revised Royal Dictionary of Manchu-Chinese

Identification of Manchu Document's Version

Summary of Nine Texts on the Bamboo Slips Collected by Qinghua University

On the Achievement of Manchu Minority Scholars about Confucian Classics in Qing Dynasty

[Textual research on the modern circulation of Zhong jing quan shu (Zhongjing's Complete Works) block-printed edition in the Ming dynasty and collected in the library of China Medical University in modern times]

A General Survey of Six Newly Restored Qinghua Bamboo Slips

The Correction of Mozi Summary in Si Ku Quan Shu Zhong Mu(Catalogue)

A Series of Studies on the Lost Catalogues of Buddhist Scriptures of the Tang and Song Dynasties

Qing-Wen-Zhi-Yao: A Famous Manchu-Chinese Textbook in Qing Dynasty and Its Value

[A Bibliophile in Shandong Province in the Republic of China Zhuang Enze and His Handwritten Copy of Shang Han Lun Xuan Zhu(Annotation of Treatise on Febrile Diseases)]

The Sketchy Textual Criticism of the Zhile Building Edition and Yeshijun-collated Edition of the Old Tang History

Textual Research on the Edition, Author and Formation Background of Meng'gu Youmu Ji

The Manchu-Chinese Manuscript Emu tanggû orin sakda-i gisun sarkiyan 百二老人語録 in the Collection of the IOM, RAS

Anthologies of Writings by Dong Qichang “Huachanshi suibi” from the Chinese Collection of the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts, Russian Academy of Sciences

Annual Bibliography*

Thoughts on Ancient Book Conservation in Peking University Library

[The versions of Shiguzhai Hui Ju Jian Bian Dan Fang by Wu Mianxue]

[The evidential research on the versions of Shanghan Lun Ben Zhi]

A Study of SHANGSHU and YIZHOUSHU with the Help of the Bamboo Slips Kept in Tsinghua University

A Review of Seopa(西陂) Yuhui(柳僖)'s Works on “Shangshu尙書”