Differences of the urban spatial structure driven by local governments: Cases study in Guangzhou and Dongguan
WU Lingjing,TONG De,LI Guicai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj201706003
2017-01-01
Geographical Research
Abstract:Since the 1980s,China has experienced great political and economic transformation that many scholars theorize as globalization,marketization and decentralization.Under this background,local governments play increasingly significant roles in shaping urban spatial structure and facilitating urban development.Local governments at multiple administrative levels and with different powers tend to produce different types of urban forms.In this paper,based on the urban land competitive bidding rental theorem,we reveal the urban spatial development character driven by local governments,and derive different urban spatial development paths under the influence of different local governments.In data analysis,we use land use data interpreted by remote sensing in the years of 1990,2000 and 2010,and several technical measures such as urban spatial morphology measure index,the moving windows algorithm,and the Sectorial analysis method.We measure and compare the constructive land scale,regularity of built-up land sprawl,and morphological evolution between Guangzhou and Dongguan,whose urban development is driven by different levels of governments-Guangzhou's municipal government and Dongguan's village/township governments respectively.Our results confirm the theoretical derivation that municipal governments tend to develop cities with a more compact and dense urban core.The development density reduces as the land development extends away from the urban core.In contrast,village/township governments tend to develop a more dispersed,scattered,and discontinuous spatial pattern.This paper highlights the different roles that local governments at different administrative levels and with different powers have played in shaping China's urban spatial structure,it contributes to the research on the mechanisms and impacts of local governments upon urban spatial reconfiguration,and calls on our attention to the linkage between local governance and urban spatial attributes.