The Evaluation of Some Two-stage Sampling Methods

Chen Wenfeng,Zhao Naiqing,Zhu Min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2012.01.004
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the bias generated by three different two-stage sampling methods in epidemiological survey.Methods There are three sampling methods in cross-section survey,which are random sampling,sampling in the central location according to prior information,convenience sample.The 95% confidence intervals are estimated according to the sampling data got by three different sampling methods.The coverage rates of the population mean by different sampling method are estimated and compared.Results The coverage rates of the population mean by different sampling methods are given in each case.Conclusion When the ICC(intraclass correlation coefficient) is small,sampling in the central location according to prior information and random sampling have the similar effect.The effect of these two methods is different with the method of convenience sample.So,We can use the method of sampling in the central location according to prior information instead of random sampling when the ICC is small.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?