A Study of the Key Concepts "heng" and "hengxian" in the Hengxian on Chu Bamboo Slips Housed at the Shanghai Museum
Ding Sixin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3868/s030-005-016-0016-6
2016-01-01
Frontiers of Philosophy in China
Abstract:This essay agrees that the two controversial characters on Slip 12 of the Hengxian should be transcribed as " " and " ," and pronounced as "ji" Secondly, with respect to six occurrences of the character " " (heng) on Slips 1-9 which Qiu Xigui reads as " " (ji), this essay holds that in the end it should be read as " " (heng), and that the reading provided by Li Ling is acceptable. Therefore, that piece of bamboo slip writing can be named " " (Hengxian). Thirdly, " " (heng) and " " (hengxian), or " " (heng) and " " (hengxian), are two concepts, the latter of which is based on the former. " " (heng) is more fundamental and more important than " " (hengxian). Scholars mostly equate " " (heng) with " " (hengxian), and even regard " " as the prior expression of this concept. One can hardly say that this is correct. In the bamboo writing, " " (heng) actually refers to " tian dao" (heavenly dao), rather than " dao" in the Laozi. The so-called " " (hengxian) suggests the very commencement of the genesis and evolvement of Heavenly dao, which is somewhat equivalent to "taishi" (grand commencement) in the Huainanzi . Fourthly, in the Hengxian, " " (heng) implies objective and natural laws, while " " (ji) suggests ought-to-be rules. " " (ji) in the bamboo writing is actually informed by " " (heng).