Relation Between Antitumor Drugs Induced Phlebitis Secondary and Different Intravenous Infusion Methods

宋向阳,李武平,张美霞,孙惠英
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4152.2007.09.001
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the damage severity of peripheral vein by taking different intravenous infusion methods.Methods Twelve healthy rabbits were randomly divided into groups A and B (n=6 in each group). In group A, intravenous injection of NVB (1 ml/min, quick injection group; 0.25 ml/min, slow injection group) was performed on ear veins at both sides. In group B, intravenous injection of 0.9% normal saline (10 ml, low volume group; 20 ml, high volume group) was done on ear veins at both sides. Twenty-four h later, local pathological changes in rabbit ear veins were observed under a light microscope.Results In slow injection group, swelling of vascular endothelial cells and infiltration of inflammatory cells in the ear veins were more severe than in quick injection group (P<0.05 for all). In low volume group, swelling of vascular endothelial cells, edema around blood vessels, infiltration of inflammatory cells and bleeding around the blood vessels were significantly milder than those in high volum group (P<0.05 for all). Conclusion When antitumour-drugs being infused, changing the infusion methods will result in different intravenous damages.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?