Opening Up the Group II Chaperonins
Zihe Rao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2010.09.004
IF: 5.871
2010-01-01
Structure
Abstract:A new study in this issue of Structure (Huo et al., 2010Huo Y. Hu Z. Zhang K. Wang L. Zhai Y. Zhou Q. Lander G. Zhu J. He Y. Pang X. et al.Structure. 2010; 18 (this issue): 1270-1279Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar) reports the crystal structure of a group II chaperonin in the open state, providing unprecedented levels of detail for the domain movements that result from ATP hydrolysis and a clearer picture of the protein folding mechanism mediated by chaperonins. A new study in this issue of Structure (Huo et al., 2010Huo Y. Hu Z. Zhang K. Wang L. Zhai Y. Zhou Q. Lander G. Zhu J. He Y. Pang X. et al.Structure. 2010; 18 (this issue): 1270-1279Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar) reports the crystal structure of a group II chaperonin in the open state, providing unprecedented levels of detail for the domain movements that result from ATP hydrolysis and a clearer picture of the protein folding mechanism mediated by chaperonins. Protein folding mediated by chaperones is critical for the survival and proper function of cells. Impaired protein folding has been implicated in a wide range of diseases, including the amyloidoses (such as Alzheimer's disease, familial amyloid cardiomyopathy, or polyneuropathy—type II diabetes), prion-related diseases (such as Creutzfeld-Jakob disease), and cancer. Elucidating the molecular basis of protein folding by chaperones is therefore essential toward understanding the overall protein folding process. Divided into two classes, the chaperonins are oligomeric molecular chaperone complexes that facilitate protein folding in an ATP-dependent manner. The conserved chaperonin structure is cylindrical and comprised of two back-to-back rings (Figure 1). Each subunit consists of three domains. An equatorial domain binds ATP and provides interring contacts; an apical domain at each end of the chaperonin binds and contains the protein to be folded; and an intermediate hinge domain connects the equatorial and apical domains. Much of the structural work to date has been concerned with the group I chaperonins, which include the widely studied GroEL, and the various conformational states associated with their protein folding mechanism have been characterized by structural techniques that include electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. The group I chaperonins are characterized by a cofactor (GroES) that closes the protein folding chamber in the presence of ATP. In contrast, the group II chaperonins have been less extensively studied, although several recent reports have begun to shed light on their three-dimensional structure and function. Unlike their group I counterparts, the group II chaperonins lack the GroES cofactor and are instead distinguished by a built-in lid at the tip of the apical domains. Until very recently, structures of group II chaperonins were only available in the closed state from Thermoplasma acidophilum and Thermococcus sp. KS-1 (Shomura et al., 2004Shomura Y. Yoshida T. Iizuka R. Maruyama T. Yohda M. Miki K. J. Mol. Biol. 2004; 335: 1265-1278Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar, Ditzel et al., 1998Ditzel L. Lowe J. Stock D. Stetter K.-O. Huber H. Huber R. Steinbacher S. Cell. 1998; 93: 125-138Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (369) Google Scholar). Despite this, nucleotide-bound structures from both studies showed the location of the nucleotide binding site and how domain movements might occur. A recent electron microscopy study of the Methanococcus maripaludis chaperonin (MmCpn) by Zhang et al., 2010Zhang J. Baker M.L. Schroder G.F. Douglas N.R. Reissmann S. Jakana J. Dougherty M. Fu C.J. Levitt M. Ludtke S.J. et al.Nature. 2010; 463: 379-384Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar reported a 4.3 Å atomic model of the closed state built directly from the single particle cryo-EM density map, which is a significant technical achievement and may provide a powerful tool for determining models of large macromolecular structures. The authors also reported a model of the open state to ∼8 Å resolution, which, although lower, was sufficient to show the local conformational changes triggered by ATP hydrolysis that lead to ring closure. A separate study by Pereira et al., 2010Pereira J.H. Ralston C.Y. Douglas N.R. Meyer D. Knee K.M. Goulet D.R. King J.A. Frydman J. Adams P.D. J. Biol. Chem. 2010; 285: 27958-27966Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar reported the crystal structures of MmCpn in the closed state at 3.3 Å resolution, and the crystal structure of MmCpn in the open state at 6 Å resolution. Whereas the group I chaperonins tend to exhibit a similar conformation of the equatorial domains between open and closed states, the group II chaperonin structural models determined by Zhang et al., 2010Zhang J. Baker M.L. Schroder G.F. Douglas N.R. Reissmann S. Jakana J. Dougherty M. Fu C.J. Levitt M. Ludtke S.J. et al.Nature. 2010; 463: 379-384Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar and Pereira et al., 2010Pereira J.H. Ralston C.Y. Douglas N.R. Meyer D. Knee K.M. Goulet D.R. King J.A. Frydman J. Adams P.D. J. Biol. Chem. 2010; 285: 27958-27966Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar show that the three domains of each subunit reorient as a single rigid body, undergoing a large anticlockwise rotation as a result of ATP hydrolysis and creating a large hydrophilic surface inside the folding chamber. In their elegant study reported in this issue of Structure, Huo et al., 2010Huo Y. Hu Z. Zhang K. Wang L. Zhai Y. Zhou Q. Lander G. Zhu J. He Y. Pang X. et al.Structure. 2010; 18 (this issue): 1270-1279Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar have determined the crystal structure of a thermosome (group II chaperonin) from Acidianus tengchongensis in the open state at 3.7 Å, representing the highest resolution structure of an open state group II chaperonin to date. The first detailed crystal structure of a thermosome in the open state is therefore of interest and will help to complete our understanding of the mechanism of group II chaperonins. From their structural analysis of the open state, they show a rotation of ∼30° of the apical and lid domains relative to the closed state, providing the clearest picture yet of the domain movements resulting from ATP hydrolysis. The authors additionally report electron microscopy reconstructions for both the open and closed states of the thermosome. This work provides a nice complement to the recent reports on group II chaperonins by Zhang et al., 2010Zhang J. Baker M.L. Schroder G.F. Douglas N.R. Reissmann S. Jakana J. Dougherty M. Fu C.J. Levitt M. Ludtke S.J. et al.Nature. 2010; 463: 379-384Crossref PubMed Scopus (169) Google Scholar and Pereira et al., 2010Pereira J.H. Ralston C.Y. Douglas N.R. Meyer D. Knee K.M. Goulet D.R. King J.A. Frydman J. Adams P.D. J. Biol. Chem. 2010; 285: 27958-27966Crossref PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, and builds upon their impressive work by providing a substantially higher resolution structure of the group II chaperonin in the open state. Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open StateHuo et al.StructureOctober 13, 2010In BriefThermosomes are group II chaperonins responsible for protein refolding in an ATP-dependent manner. Little is known regarding the conformational changes of thermosomes during their functional cycle due to a lack of high-resolution structure in the open state. Here, we report the first complete crystal structure of thermosome (rATcpnβ) in the open state from Acidianus tengchongensis. There is a ∼30° rotation of the apical and lid domains compared with the previous closed structure. Besides, the structure reveals a conspicuous hydrophobic patch in the lid domain, and residues locating in this patch are conserved across species. Full-Text PDF Open Archive